In Elasticsearch 5.x, there are only two ways to communicate with the server using HTTP protocol or the native one. In this recipe, we will take a look at these main protocols.
The standard installation of Elasticsearch provides access via its web services on port 9200 for HTTP and 9300 for native Elasticsearch protocol. Simply starting an Elasticsearch server, you can communicate on these ports with it.
Elasticsearch is designed to be used as a RESTful server, so the main protocol is the HTTP usually on port 9200 and above. This is the only protocol that can be used by programming languages that don't run on a Java Virtual Machine (JVM).
Every protocol has advantages and disadvantages. It's important to choose the correct one depending on the kind of applications you are developing. If you are in doubt, choose the HTTP protocol layer that is the most standard and easy to use.
Choosing the right protocol depends on several factors, mainly architectural and performance related. This schema factorizes the advantages and disadvantages related to them:
|
Protocol |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Type |
|
HTTP |
This is more frequently used. It is API safe and has general compatibility for different ES versions. Suggested. JSON. It is easy to proxy and to balance with HTTP balancers. |
This is an HTTP overhead. HTTP clients don't know the cluster topology, so they require more hops to access data. |
Text |
|
Native |
This is a fast network layer. It is programmatic. It is best for massive index operations. |
The API changes and breaks applications. It depends on the same version of ES Server. Only on JVM. It is more compact due to its binary nature. It is faster because the clients know the cluster topology. The native serializer/deserializer are more efficient than the JSON ones. |
Binary |
