Git Version Control Cookbook - Second Edition

5 (5 reviews total)
By Kenneth Geisshirt , Emanuele Zattin , Aske Olsson and 1 more
  • Instant online access to over 7,500+ books and videos
  • Constantly updated with 100+ new titles each month
  • Breadth and depth in over 1,000+ technologies
  1. Navigating Git

About this book

Git is one of the most popular tools for versioning. Git Version Control Cookbook builds on the success of the previous edition and provides you with an up-to-date guide to solving problems related to versioning.

You’ll start by learning about the Git data model and how it stores files and looks at commits. By using simple commands, you’ll learn how to navigate through the database. Once you have accustomed yourself to the basics, you’ll explore techniques to configure Git with comprehensive examples and configuration targets. You’ll gain insights into improving your understanding of branches and recovery from mistakes — right from committing to a wrong branch to recovering lost commits or files. You’ll then move on to discovering the features that Git rebase has to offer and use regular Git merge on other branches. You’ll explore Git notes and learn how to utilize the update, list, and search commands. In addition to this, you’ll learn how to extract metadata from repositories and automate your daily tasks using Git hooks. You’ll then study in detail repository maintenance, patching, and offline sharing. By the end of the book, you’ll have grasped various tips and tricks for everyday usage, while increasing your knowledge of Git providers, integrations, and clients.

Publication date:
July 2018
Publisher
Packt
Pages
354
ISBN
9781789137545

 

Chapter 1. Navigating Git

In this chapter, we will cover the following topics:

  • Git's objects
  • The three stages
  • Viewing the DAG
  • Extracting fixed issues
  • Getting a list of the changed files
  • Viewing the history with gitk
  • Finding commits in the history
  • Searching through the history code
 

Introduction


In this chapter, we will take a look at Git's data model. We will learn how Git references its objects and how the history is recorded. We will learn how to navigate the history, from finding certain text snippets in commit messages, to the introducing a particular string in the code.

The data model of Git is different from other common version control systems (VCSs) in the way Git handles its data. Traditionally, a VCS will store its data as an initial file, followed by a list of patches for each new version of the file:

Git is different: Instead of the regular file and patches list, Git records a snapshot of all the files tracked by Git and their paths relative to the repository root—that is, the files tracked by Git in the filesystem tree. Each commit in Git records the full tree state. If a file does not change between commits, Git will not store the file again. Instead, Git stores a link to the file. This is shown in the diagram below where you see how the files will be after every commit/version.

This is what makes Git different from most other VCSs, and, in the following chapters, we will explore some of the benefits of this powerful model.

The way Git references files and directories is directly built into the data model. In short, the Git data model can be summarized as shown in the following diagram:

The commit object points to the root tree. The root tree points to subtrees and files.

Branches and tags point to a commit object and the HEAD object points to the branch that is currently checked out. So, for every commit, the full tree state and snapshot are identified by the root tree.

 

Git's objects


Now, since you know that Git stores every commit as a full tree state or snapshot, let's take a closer look at the object's Git store in the repository.

Git's object storage is a key-value storage, the key being the ID of the object and the value being the object itself. The key is an SHA-1 hash of the object, with some additional information, such as size. There are four types of objects in Git, as well as branches (which are not objects, but which are important) and the special HEAD pointer that refers to the branch/commit currently being checked out. The four object types are as follows:

  • Files, or blobs as they are also called in the Git context
  • Directories, or trees in the Git context
  • Commits
  • Tags

We will start by looking at the most recent commit object in the repository we just cloned, keeping in mind that the special HEAD pointer points to the branch that is currently being checked out.

Getting ready

To view the objects in the Git database, we first need a repository to be examined. For this recipe, we will clone an example repository in the following location:

$ git clone https://github.com/PacktPublishing/Git-Version-Control-Cookbook-Second-Edition.git
$ cd Git-Version-Control-Cookbook-Second-Edition

Now you are ready to look at the objects in the database. We will start by looking first at the commit object, followed by the trees, the files, and finally, the branches and tags.

How to do it...

Let's take a closer look at the object's Git stores in the repository.

The commit object

The Git's specialHEAD object always points to the current snapshot/commit, so we can use that as the target for our request of the commit that we want to have a look at:

$ git cat-file -p HEAD
tree 34fa038544bcd9aed660c08320214bafff94150b
parent 5c662c018efced42ca5e9cce709787c40a849f34
author John Doe <[email protected]> 1386933960 +0100
committer John Doe <[email protected]> 1386941455 +0100

This is the subject line of the commit message. It should be followed by a blank line and then the body, which is this text. Here, you can use multiple paragraphs to explain your commit. It's like an email with a subject and a body to try to attract people's attention to the subject.

The cat-file command with the -p option prints the object given on the command line; in this case, HEAD, points to master, which, in turn, points to the most recent commit on the branch.

We can now see the commit object, consisting of the root tree (tree), the parent commit object's ID (parent), the author and timestamp information (author), the committer and timestamp information (committer), and the commit message.

The tree object

To see the tree object, we can run the same command on the tree, but with the tree ID (34fa038544bcd9aed660c08320214bafff94150b) as the target:

$ git cat-file -p 34fa038544bcd9aed660c08320214bafff94150b 
100644 blob f21dc2804e888fee6014d7e5b1ceee533b222c15    README.md
040000 tree abc267d04fb803760b75be7e665d3d69eeed32f8    a_sub_directory
100644 blob b50f80ac4d0a36780f9c0636f43472962154a11a    another-file.txt
100644 blob 92f046f17079aa82c924a9acf28d623fcb6ca727    cat-me.txt
100644 blob bb2fe940924c65b4a1cefcbdbe88c74d39eb23cd    hello_world.c

We can also specify that we want the tree object from the commit pointed to by HEAD by specifying git cat-file -p HEAD^{tree}, which would give the same results as the previous command. The special notation HEAD^{tree} means that from the reference given, HEAD recursively dereferences the object at the reference until a tree object is found.

The first tree object is the root tree object found from the commit pointed to by the master branch, which is pointed to by HEAD. A generic form of the notation is <rev>^<type>, and will return the first object of <type>, searching recursively from <rev>.

From the tree object, we can see what it contains: the file type/permissions, type (tree/blob), ID, and pathname:

Type/

Permissions

Type

ID/SHA-1

Pathname

100644

blob

f21dc2804e888fee6014d7e5b1ceee533b222c15

README.md

040000

tree

abc267d04fb803760b75be7e665d3d69eeed32f8

a_sub_directory

100644

blob

b50f80ac4d0a36780f9c0636f43472962154a11a

another-file.txt

100644

blob

92f046f17079aa82c924a9acf28d623fcb6ca727

cat-me.txt

100644

blob

bb2fe940924c65b4a1cefcbdbe88c74d39eb23cd

hello-world.c

The blob object

Now, we can investigate the blob (file) object. We can do this using the same command, giving the blob ID as the target for the cat-me.txt file:

$ git cat-file -p 92f046f17079aa82c924a9acf28d623fcb6ca727

The content of the file is cat-me.txt.

Not really that exciting, huh?

This is simply the content of the file, which we can also get by running a normal cat cat-me.txt command. So, the objects are tied together, blobs to trees, trees to other trees, and the root tree to the commit object, all connected by the SHA-1 identifier of the object.

The branch object

The branch object is not really like any other Git objects; you can't print it using the cat-file command as we can with the others (if you specify the -p pretty print, you'll just get the commit object it points to), as shown in the following code:

$ git cat-file master
usage: git cat-file (-t|-s|-e|-p|<type>|--textconv) <object>
or: git cat-file (--batch|--batch-check) < <list_of_objects>
    
<type> can be one of: blob, tree, commit, tag.
...
$ git cat-file -p master
tree 34fa038544bcd9aed660c08320214bafff94150b
parent a90d1906337a6d75f1dc32da647931f932500d83
...

Instead, we can take a look at the branch inside the .git folder where the whole Git repository is stored. If we open the text file .git/refs/heads/master, we can actually see the commit ID that the master branch points to. We can do this using cat, as follows:

$ cat .git/refs/heads/master
13dcada077e446d3a05ea9cdbc8ecc261a94e42d 

We can verify that this is the latest commit by running git log -1:

$ git log -1
commit 34acc370b4d6ae53f051255680feaefaf7f7850d (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: John Doe <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri Dec 13 12:26:00 2013 +0100
    
This is the subject line of the commit message
...

We can also see that HEAD is pointing to the active branch by using cat with the .git/HEAD file:

$ cat .git/HEAD
ref: refs/heads/master

The branch object is simply a pointer to a commit, identified by its SHA-1 hash.

The tag object

The last object to be analyzed is the tag object. There are three different kinds of tag: a lightweight (just a label) tag, an annotated tag, and a signed tag. In the example repository, there are two annotated tags:

$ git tag
v0.1
v1.0

Let's take a closer look at the v1.0 tag:

$ git cat-file -p v1.0
object f55f7383b57ad7c11cf56a7c55a8d738af4741ce
type commit
tag v1.0
tagger John Doe <[email protected]> 1526017989 +0200

We got the hello world C program merged, let's call that a release 1.0 

As you can see, the tag consists of an object—which, in this case, is the latest commit on the master branch—the object's type (commits, blobs, and trees can be tagged), the tag name, the tagger and timestamp, and finally the tag message.

How it works...

The Git command git cat-file -p will print the object given as an input. Normally, it is not used in everyday Git commands, but it is quite useful to investigate how it ties the objects together.

We can also verify the output of git cat-file by rehashing it with the Git command git hash-object; for example, if we want to verify the commit object at HEAD (34acc370b4d6ae53f051255680feaefaf7f7850d), we can run the following command:

$ git cat-file -p HEAD | git hash-object -t commit --stdin
13dcada077e446d3a05ea9cdbc8ecc261a94e42d

If you see the same commit hash as HEAD pointing towards you, you can verify whether it is correct using git log -1.

There's more...

There are many ways to see the objects in the Git database. The git ls-tree command can easily show the content of trees and subtrees, and git show can show the Git objects, but in a different way.

 

The three stages


We have seen the different objects in Git, but how do we create them? In this example, we'll see how to create a blob, tree, and commit object in the repository. We'll also learn about the three stages of creating a commit.

Getting ready

We'll use the same Git-Version-Control-Cookbook-Second-Edition repository that we saw in the last recipe:

$ git clone https://github.com/PacktPublishing/Git-Version-Control-Cookbook-Second-Edition.git
$ cd Git-Version-Control-Cookbook-Second-Edition

How to do it...

  1. First, we'll make a small change to the file and check git status:
$ echo "Another line" >> another-file.txt
$ git status
On branch master
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'.
    
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
    
modified:   another-file.txt
    
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

This, of course, just tells us that we have modified another-file.txt and we need to use git add to stage it.

  1. Let's add the another-file.txt file and run git status again:
$ git add another-file.txt
$ git status
On branch master
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'.
    
Changes to be committed:
(use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
    
modified:   another-file.txt

The file is now ready to be committed, just as you have probably seen before. But what happens during the add command? The add command, generally speaking, moves files from the working directory to the staging area; however, this is not all that actually happens, though you don't see it. When a file is moved to the staging area, the SHA-1 hash of the file is created and the blob object is written to Git's database. This happens every time a file is added, but if nothing changes for a file, it means that it is already stored in the database. At first, this might seem that the database will grow quickly, but this is not the case. Garbage collection kicks in at times, compressing, and cleaning up the database and keeping only the objects that are required.

  1. We can edit the file again and run git status:
$ echo 'Whoops almost forgot this' >> another-file.txt
$ git status
On branch master
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'.
   
Changes to be committed:
(use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
    
modified:   another-file.txt
    
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
    
modified:   another-file.txt

Now, the file shows up in both the Changes to be committed and Changes not staged for commit sections. This looks a bit weird at first, but there is, of course, a reason for this. When we added the file the first time, the content of it was hashed and stored in Git's database. The changes arising from the second change to the file have not yet been hashed and written to the database; it only exists in the working directory. Therefore, the file shows up in both the Changes to be committed and Changes not staged for commit sections; the first change is ready to be committed, the second is not. Let's also add the second change:

$ git add another-file.txt
$ git status
On branch master
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'.
    
Changes to be committed:
(use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
    
modified:   another-file.txt 
  1. Now, all the changes we have made to the file are ready to be committed, and we can record a commit:
$ git commit -m 'Another change to another file'
[master 99fac83] Another change to another file
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

How it works...

As we learned previously, the add command creates the blob, tree, and commit objects; however, they are also created when we run the commit command. We can view these objects using the cat-file command, as we saw in the previous recipe:

$ git cat-file -p HEAD
tree 162201200b5223d48ea8267940c8090b23cbfb60
parent 13dcada077e446d3a05ea9cdbc8ecc261a94e42d
author John Doe <[email protected]> 1524163792 +0200
committer John Doe <[email protected]> 1524163792 +0200

Making changes to another file.

The root-tree object from the commit is as follows:

$ git cat-file -p HEAD^{tree}
100644 blob f21dc2804e888fee6014d7e5b1ceee533b222c15  README.md
040000 tree abc267d04fb803760b75be7e665d3d69eeed32f8  a_sub_directory
100644 blob 35d31106c5d6fdb38c6b1a6fb43a90b183011a4b  another-file.txt
100644 blob 92f046f17079aa82c924a9acf28d623fcb6ca727  cat-me.txt
100644 blob bb2fe940924c65b4a1cefcbdbe88c74d39eb23cd  hello_world.c

From the previous recipe, we know that the SHA-1 of the root tree was 34fa038544bcd9aed660c08320214bafff94150b and the SHA-1 of the another-file.txt file was b50f80ac4d0a36780f9c0636f43472962154a11a, and, as expected, they changed in our latest commit when we updated the another-file.txt file. We added the same file, another-file.txt, twice before we created the commit, recording the changes to the history of the repository. We also learned that the add command creates a blob object when called. So, in the Git database, there must have been an object similar to the content of another-file.txt the first time we added the file to the staging area. We can use the git fsck command to check for dangling objects—that is, objects that are not referred to by other objects or references:

$ git fsck --dangling
Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done.
dangling blob ad46f2da274ed6c79a16577571a604d3281cd6d9 

Let's check the content of the blob using the following command:

$ git cat-file -p ad46f2da274ed6c79a16577571a604d3281cd6d9
This is just another file
Another line

The blob was, as expected, similar to the content of another-file.txt when we added it to the staging area the first time.

The following diagram describes the tree stages and the commands used to move between the stages:

See also

For more examples and information on the cat-file and fsck commands, please consult the Git documentation at https://git-scm.com/docs/git-cat-file and https://git-scm.com/docs/git-fsck.

 

Viewing the DAG


The history in Git is formed from the commit objects; as development advances, branches are created and merged, and the history will create a directed acyclic graph, the DAG, because of the way that Git ties a commit to its parent commit. The DAG makes it easy to see the development of a project based on the commits.

Please note that the arrows in the following diagram are dependency arrows, meaning that each commit points to its parent commit(s), which is why the arrows point in the opposite direction to the normal flow of time:

A graph of the example repository with abbreviated commit IDs

You can view the history (the DAG) in Git by using its git log command. There are also a number of visual Git tools that can graphically display the history. This section will show some features of git log.

Getting ready

We will use the example repository from the last section and ensure that the master branch is pointing to 34acc37:

$ git checkout master && git reset --hard 34acc37

In the previous command, we only use the first seven characters (34acc37) of the commit ID; this is fine as long as the abbreviated ID that is used is unique in the repository.

How to do it...

  1. The simplest way to see the history is to use the git log command; this will display the history in reverse chronological order. The output is paged through less and can be further limited, for example, by providing only the number of commits in the history to be displayed:
$ git log -3
  1. This will display the following result:
commit 34acc370b4d6ae53f051255680feaefaf7f7850d
Author: John Doe <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri Dec 13 12:26:00 2013 +0100
    
This is the subject line of the commit message.
    
    
It should be followed by a blank line then the body, which is this text. Here 
you can have multiple paragraphs etc. and explain your commit. It's like an 
email with subject and body, so try to get people's attention in the subject
    
commit a90d1906337a6d75f1dc32da647931f932500d83
Author: John Doe <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri Dec 13 12:17:42 2013 +0100
    
Instructions for compiling hello_world.c
    
commit 485884efd6ac68cc7b58c643036acd3cd208d5c8
Merge: 44f1e05 0806a8b
Author: John Doe <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri Dec 13 12:14:49 2013 +0100
    
Merge branch 'feature/1'
    
Adds a hello world C program.
  

Note

Turn on colors in the Git output by running git config --global color.ui auto.

  1. By default, git log prints the commit, author's name and email ID, timestamp, and the commit message. However, the information isn't very graphical, especially if you want to see branches and merges. To display this information and limit some of the other data, you can use the following options with git log:
$ git log --decorate --graph --oneline --all
  1. The previous command will show one commit per line (--oneline), identified by its abbreviated commit ID, and the commit message subject. A graph will be drawn between the commits depicting their dependency (--graph). The --decorate option shows the branch names after the abbreviated commit ID, and the --all option shows all the branches, instead of just the current one(s):
$ git log --decorate --graph --oneline --all
* 34acc37 (HEAD, tag: v1.0, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master) This is the sub...
* a90d190 Instructions for compiling hello_world.c
*   485884e Merge branch 'feature/1'
...

This output, however, gives neither the timestamp nor the author information, because of the way the --oneline option formats the output.

  1. Fortunately, the log command gives us the ability to create our own output format. So, we can make a history view similar to the previous one. The colors are made with the %C<color-name>text-be-colored%Creset syntax, along with the author and timestamp information and some colors to display it nicely:
 $ git log --all --graph \
   --pretty=format:'%Cred%h%Creset -%C(yellow)%d%Creset %s %Cgreen(%ci) %C(bold blue)<%an>%Creset'

  1. This is a bit cumbersome to write, but luckily, it can be made as an alias so you only have to write it once:
git config --global alias.graph "log --all --graph --pretty=format:'%Cred%h%Creset -%C(yellow)%d%Creset %s %Cgreen(%ci) %C(bold blue)<%an>%Creset'"

Note

Now, all you need to do is call git graph to show the history, as you have seen previously.

How it works...

Git traverses the DAG by following the parent IDs (hashes) from the given commit(s). The options passed to git log can format the output in different ways; this can serve several purposes—for example, to give a nice graphical view of the history, branches, and tags, as seen previously, or to extract specific information from the history of a repository to use, for example, in a script.

 

Extracting fixed issues


A common use case of creating a release is to create a release note, containing, among other things, the bugs fixed in the release. A good practice is to write in the commit message whether a bug is fixed by the commit. A better practice is to have a standard way of doing this—for example, a line with the string "Fixes-bug: ", followed by the bug identifier in the last part of the commit message. This makes it easy to compile a list of bugs fixed for a release note. The JGit project is a good example of this; their bug identifier in the commit messages is a simple "Bug: " string followed by the bug ID.

This recipe will show you how to limit the output of git log to only list the commits since the last release (tag), which contains a bug fix.

Getting ready

Clone the JGit repository using the following command lines:

$ git clone https://git.eclipse.org/r/jgit/jgit
$ cd jgit 

If you want the exact same output as in this example, reset your master branch to b14a93971837610156e815ae2eee3baaa5b7a44b:

$ git checkout master && git reset --hard b14a939

How to do it...

You are now ready to look through the commit log for commit messages that describe the bugs fixed.

  1. First, let's limit the log to only look through the history since the last tag (release). To find the last tag, we can use git describe:
$ git describe 
v3.1.0.201310021548-r-96-gb14a939

The preceding output tells us three things:

    • The last tag was v3.1.0.201310021548-r
    • The number of commits since the tag was 96
    • The current commit in abbreviated form is b14a939

Now, the log can be parsed from HEAD to v3.1.0.201310021548-r. But just running git log 3.1.0.201310021548-r..HEAD will give us all 96 commits, and we just want the commits with the commit messages that contain "Bug: xxxxxx" for our release note. The xxxxxx is an identifier for the bug, and will be a number. We can use the --grep option with git log for this purpose, making the code phrase git log --grep "Bug: ". This will give us all the commits containing "Bug: " in the commit message; all we need to do now is just to format it to something that we can use for our release note.

  1. Now, let's say we want the release note format to look like the following template:
Commit-id: Commit subject Fixes-bug: xxx
  1. Our command line so far is as follows:
$ git log --grep "Bug: " v3.1.0.201310021548-r..HEAD

This gives us all the bug fix commits, but we can format this to a format that is easily parsed with the --pretty option.

  1. First, we will print the abbreviated commit ID (%h), followed by a separator of our choice (|), and then the commit subject (%s, the first line of the commit message), followed by a new line (%n), and the body (%b):
--pretty="%h|%s%n%b"

The output, of course, needs to be parsed, but that's easy with regular Linux tools, such as grep and sed.

  1. First, we just want the lines that contain "|" or "Bug: ":
grep -E "\||Bug: "
  1. Then, we replace these with sed:
sed -e 's/|/: /' -e 's/Bug:/Fixes-bug:/'
  1. The entire command put together is as follows:
$ git log --grep "Bug: " v3.1.0.201310021548-r..HEAD --pretty="%h|%s%n%b" | grep -E "\||Bug: " | sed -e 's/|/: /' -e 's/Bug:/Fixes-bug:/'
  1. The previous set of commands gives the following output:
f86a488: Implement rebase.autostash 
Fixes-bug: 422951 
7026658: CLI status should support --porcelain 
Fixes-bug: 419968 
e0502eb: More helpful InvalidPathException messages (include reason) 
Fixes-bug: 413915 
f4dae20: Fix IgnoreRule#isMatch returning wrong result due to missing reset 
Fixes-bug: 423039       
7dc8a4f: Fix exception on conflicts with recursive merge 
Fixes-bug: 419641 
99608f0: Fix broken symbolic links on Cygwin. 
Fixes-bug: 419494 
...  

Now, we can extract the bug information from the bug tracker and put the preceding code in the release note as well, if necessary.

How it works...

First, we limit the git log command to only show the range of commits we are interested in, and then we further limit the output by filtering the "Bug: " string in the commit message. We pretty print the string so we can easily format it to a style we need for the release note, and finally, find "Bug: " and replace it by "Fixes-bug: " using grep and sed to completely match the style of the release note.

There's more...

If we just wanted to extract the bug IDs from the commit messages and didn't care about the commit IDs, we could have just used grep after the git log command, still limiting the log to the last tag:

$ git log  v3.1.0.201310021548-r..HEAD | grep "Bug: "

If we just want the commit IDs and their subjects, but not the actual bug IDs, we can use the --oneline feature of git log combined with the --grep option:

$ git log --grep "Bug: " --oneline  v3.1.0.201310021548-r..HEAD
 

Getting a list of the changed files


As we saw in the previous recipe, where a list of fixed issues was extracted from the history, a list of all the files that have been changed since the last release can also easily be extracted. The files can be further filtered to find those that have been added, deleted, modified, and so on.

Getting ready

The same repository and HEAD position (HEAD pointing to b14a939) that we saw in the previous recipe will be used. The release is also the same, which is v3.1.0.201310021548-r.

How to do it...

The following command lists all the files that have changed since the last release (v3.1.0.201310021548-r):

$ git diff --name-only v3.1.0.201310021548-r..HEAD
org.eclipse.jgit.packaging/org.eclipse.jgit.target/jgit-4.3.target
org.eclipse.jgit.packaging/org.eclipse.jgit.target/jgit-4.4.target 
org.eclipse.jgit.pgm.test/tst/org/eclipse/jgit/pgm/DescribeTest.java 
org.eclipse.jgit.pgm.test/tst/org/eclipse/jgit/pgm/FetchTest.java 
org.eclipse.jgit.pgm/src/org/eclipse/jgit/pgm/Describe.java 
...  

How it works...

The git diff command operates on the same revision range as git log did in the previous recipe. By specifying --name-only, Git will only give the paths of the files that were changed by the commits in the range specified as output.

There's more...

The output of the command can be further filtered: If we only want to show which files have been deleted in the repository since the last commit, we can use the --diff-filter switch with git diff:

$ git diff --name-only --diff-filter=D  v3.1.0.201310021548-r..HEAD 
org.eclipse.jgit.junit/src/org/eclipse/jgit/junit/SampleDataRepositoryTestCase.java 
org.eclipse.jgit.packaging/org.eclipse.jgit.target/org.eclipse.jgit.target.target 
org.eclipse.jgit.test/tst/org/eclipse/jgit/internal/storage/file/GCTest.java  

There are also switches for the files that have been added (A), copied (C), deleted (D), modified (M), renamed (R), and so on.

See also

For more information, visit the Help page by running the git help diff command.

 

Viewing the history with gitk


We saw earlier how we can view the history (the DAG) and visualize it by using git log. However, as the history grows, the terminal representation of the history can be a bit cumbersome to navigate. Fortunately, there are a lot of graphical tools in Git, one of them being gitk, which works on multiple platforms (Linux, Mac, and Windows).

This recipe will show you how to get started with gitk.

Getting ready

Make sure you have gitk installed:

$ which gitk
/usr/local/bin/gitk

If nothing shows up, then gitk is not installed on your system, or at least is not available on your $PATH.

Change the directory to the Git-Version-Control-Cookbook-Second-Edition repository from the objects and DAG examples. Make sure the master branch is checked out and pointing to 13dcad:

$ git checkout master && git reset --hard 13dcad

How to do it...

In the repository, run gitk --all & to bring up the gitk interface. You can also specify the commit range or branches you want, just as you did with git log (or provide --all to see everything):

$ gitk --all &

Gitk shows the commit history of the repository:

How it works...

Gitk parses the information for every commit and the objects attached to it to provide an easy graphical information screen that shows a graph of the history, author, and timestamp for each commit. In the bottom half is the result of selecting a commit. The commit message and the patches for each file that has changed . Moreover, a list of files that have been changed is displayed to the right.

Though very lightweight and fast, gitk is a very powerful tool. There are many different context menus that appear after the user clicks on a commit, a branch, or a tag in the history view. You can create and delete branches, revert and cherry-pick commits, diff selected commits, and much more.

There's more...

From the interface, you can perform a find and search operation. Find looks through the history and Search looks through the information displayed in the lower half of gitk for the commit that is currently highlighted.

 

Finding commits in the history


You already saw in the previous recipe how we can filter the output of git log to only list commits with the "Bug: "string in the commit message. In this example, we will use the same technique to find specific commits in the entire history.

Getting ready

Again, we will use the JGit repository, trying to find commits related to the "Performance" keyword. In this recipe, we will look through the entire history, so we don't need the master branch to point to a specific commit.

How to do it...

As we tried earlier, we can use the --grep option to find specific strings in commit messages. In this recipe, we look at the entire history and search every commit that has "Performance" in its commit message:

$ git log --grep "Performance" --oneline --all 
e3f19a529 Performance improvement on writing a large index
83ad74b6b SHA-1: collision detection support
48e245fc6 RefTreeDatabase: Ref database using refs/txn/committed
087b5051f Skip redundant 'OR-reuse' step in tip commit bitmap setup
9613b04d8 Merge "Performance fixes in DateRevQueue"
84afea917 Performance fixes in DateRevQueue
7cad0adc7 DHT: Remove per-process ChunkCache
d9b224aeb Delete DiffPerformanceTest
e7a3e590e Reuse DiffPerformanceTest support code to validate algorithms
fb1c7b136 Wait for JIT optimization before measuring diff performance   

How it works...

In this example, we specifically ask Git to consider all of the commits in the history by supplying the --all switch. Git runs through the DAG and checks whether the "Performance" string is included in the commit message. For an easy overview of the results, the --oneline switch is also used to limit the output to just the subject of the commit message. Hopefully then, the commit(s) we needed to find can be identified from this, much shorter, list of commits.

Note that the search is case sensitive—had we searched for "performance" (all in lower case), the list of commits would have been very different:

$ git log --grep "performance" --oneline --all
d7deda98d Skip ignored directories in FileTreeIterator
5a87d5040 Teach UploadPack "include-tag" in "fetch"
7d9246f16 RawParseUtils#lineMap: Simplify by using null sentinel internally
4bfc6c2ae Significantly speed up FileTreeIterator on Windows
4644d15bc GC: Replace Files methods with File alternatives
d3021788d Use bitmaps for non-commit reachability checks
6b1e3c58b Run auto GC in the background
db7761025 Pack refs/tags/ with refs/heads/
30eb6423a Add GC_REST PackSource to better order DFS packs
... more output 

There's more...

We also could have used the Find feature in gitk to find the same commits. Open gitk with the --all switch, type Performance in the Find field, and hit Enter. This will highlight the commits in the history view, and you can navigate to the previous/next result by pressing Shift + up arrow, Shift + down arrow, or the buttons next to the Find field. You will still, however, be able to see the entire history in the view with the matching commits highlighted:

 

Searching through the history code


Sometimes, it is not enough to list the commit messages. You may want to know which commits touched a specific method or variable. This is also possible using git log. You can perform a search for a string, for example, or a variable or method, and git log will give you the commits, adding or deleting the string from the history. In this way, you can easily get the full commit context for the piece of code.

Getting ready

Again, we will use the JGit repository with the master branch pointing to b14a939:

$ git checkout master && git reset --hard b14a939

How to do it...

We would like to find all the commits that have had changes made to the lines that contain the "isOutdated" method. Again, we will just display the commits on one line each; we can then check them individually later:

$ git log -G"isOutdated" --oneline 
f32b861 JGit 3.0: move internal classes into an internal subpackage 
c9e4a78 Add isOutdated method to DirCache 
797ebba Add support for getting the system wide configuration 
ad5238d Move FileRepository to storage.file.FileRepository 
4c14b76 Make lib.Repository abstract and lib.FileRepository its implementation 
c9c57d3 Rename Repository 'config' as 'repoConfig' 
5c780b3 Fix unit tests using MockSystemReader with user configuation 
cc905e7 Make Repository.getConfig aware of changed config  

We can see that eight commits have patches that involve the string "isOutdated".

How it works...

Git looks over the history (the DAG) looking at each commit for the "isOutdated" string in the patch between the parent commit and the current commit. This method is quite convenient to use in finding out when a given string was introduced or deleted, and to get the full context and commit at that point in time.

There's more...

The -G option used with git log will look for differences in the patches that contain added or deleted lines that match the given string. However, these lines could also have been added or removed because of some other refactoring/renaming of a variable or method. There is another option that can be used with git log, namely -S, which will look through the difference in the patch text in a similar way to the -G option, but will only match commits where there is a change in the number of occurrences of the specified string—that is, a line added or removed, but not added and removed.

Let's see the output of the -S option:

$ git log -S"isOutdated" --oneline f32b861 JGit 3.0: move internal classes into an internal subpackagec9e4a78 Add isOutdated method to DirCache797ebba Add support for getting the system wide configurationad5238d Move FileRepository to storage.file.FileRepository4c14b76 Make lib.Repository abstract and lib.FileRepository its implementation5c780b3 Fix unit tests using MockSystemReader with user configuationcc905e7 Make Repository.getConfig aware of changed config

The search matches seven commits, whereas the search with the -G option matches eight commits. The difference is that the commit with the ID c9c57d3 is only found with the -G option in the first list. A closer look at this commit shows that the isOutdated string is only touched because of the renaming of another object, and this is why it is filtered away from the list of matching commits in the last list when using the -S option. We can see the content of the commit with the git show command, and use grep -C4 to limit the output to just the four lines before and after the search string:

$ git show c9c57d3 | grep -C4 "isOutdated"
    @@ -417,14 +417,14 @@ public FileBasedConfig getConfig() {
               throw new RuntimeException(e);
             }
           }
    -    if (config.isOutdated()) {
    +    if (repoConfig.isOutdated()) {
             try {
    -              loadConfig();
    +              loadRepoConfig();
             } catch (IOException e) {

About the Authors

  • Kenneth Geisshirt

    Kenneth Geisshirt is a chemist, by education, and a strong free-software advocate. He spent his Christmas holidays in 1992 installing SLS Linux, and GNU/Linux has been his favorite operating system ever since. Currently, he does consultancy work in fields such as scientific computing and Linux clusters. He lives in Copenhagen, Denmark, with his partner and their two children.

    Browse publications by this author
  • Emanuele Zattin

    Emanuele Zattin is the Continuous Integration Specialist at Realm Inc. with experience in software development and design. He is respected for his work in designing and developing a CM Synergy to Git history conversion tool and rolling out Git-Gerrit-Jenkins in several Nokia divisions.

    Browse publications by this author
  • Aske Olsson

    Aske Olsson has more than 14 years of experience in the software industry. As an electrical engineer, he has been using every tool available for development, from a soldering iron over Assembly, C, Java Groovy, Python and various DSLs for programming to different SCMs and build-, CI- and issue-tracking systems. He has worked for Nokia for 6 years and, currently, works at Keylane. Aske has experience with Git; he has been teaching Git in regular training sessions, from basic Git to advanced usage.

    Browse publications by this author
  • Rasmus Voss

    Rasmus Voss has been working with continuous integration, continuous delivery, automatic testing, and DevOps, in various industries. He has always strived to ensure that where developers, testers, project leaders, and managers can work with the system instead of against the system. Typically, the processes and solutions he develops are clear, precise, and well documented, with relevant feedback to all parts of the software development process.

    Browse publications by this author

Latest Reviews

(5 reviews total)
The process was smooth. The book I haven't looked through yet.
Great selection, fantastic prices.
kann ich uneingeschränkt empfehlen

Recommended For You

Mastering GitLab 12

An expert guide to helping you use DevOps techniques with the latest GitLab version to optimize and manage your software workflow

By Joost Evertse
Version Control with Git and GitHub

Learn to create and enforce checks and controls for tracking, merging, and approval of changes in your source code

By Alex Magana and 1 more
Extreme C

Push the limits of what C - and you - can do, with this high-intensity guide to the most advanced capabilities of C

By Kamran Amini
Networking Fundamentals

Become well-versed with basic networking concepts such as routing, switching, and subnetting, and prepare for the Microsoft 98-366 exam

By Gordon Davies