This book is intended for any SQL Server developer or database administrator (DBA) who wants to start working in the data science field. In addition, this book is also aimed at existing data scientists who want to start using SQL Server with related services and tools. I will use, and show examples in, three programming languages in this book: Transact-SQL (or T-SQL), R, and Python. Therefore, it makes sense to start with a brief introduction of the three languages. This is what the first three chapters are about. If you are already a SQL Server developer, proficient in writing T-SQL queries, you can simply skip the first chapter. If you are already working with R, skip the second chapter. If you are familiar with Python, please feel free to skip the third chapter.
This first chapter is not a comprehensive reference guide to T-SQL; I will focus on the mighty
SELECT statement only, the statement you need to use immediately when your data is located in a SQL Server database. However, besides the basic clauses, I will also explain advanced techniques, such as window functions, common table expressions, and theÂ
This chapter will cover the following points:
- Core Transact-SQL SELECT statement elements
- Advanced SELECT techniques
If you don't have a SQL Server yet, you can use a free SQL Server Evaluation Edition or Developer Edition. You can download any of them from the SQL Server downloads site at https://www.microsoft.com/en-ca/sql-server/sql-server-downloads.
Database Engine Services
- With both languages,
Python, selected, like you can see in the next screenshot
After that, all you need is client tools, and you can start writing the code. The following screenshot shows the SQL Server setup
Feature Selection page with the appropriate features selected:
Figure 1.1: SQL Server Setup feature selection
The next step is to install client tools. Of course, you need SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS). You can download it atÂ https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/ssms/download-sql-server-management-studio-ssms?view=sql-server-2017. If you are not familiar with this tool, please use the SSMS at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/ssms/tutorials/tutorial-sql-server-management-studio?view=sql-server-2017 to learn the basics about this tool.
In the next two chapters, I will explain what other tools you need to efficiently write R and Python code, respectively.
Finally, you need some demo data. I will mostly use the
AdventureWorksDW2017 demo database in this book. You can find this demo database and other Microsoft samples at https://github.com/Microsoft/sql-server-samples/releases. I will point you to the appropriate sources when I use any other demo data in this book.
After you install everything mentioned so for, you are ready to start learning or renewing the knowledge of the T-SQL
You probably already know that the most important SQL statement is the mighty
SELECT statement you use to retrieve data from your databases. Every database developer knows the basic clauses and their usage:
SELECT: Defines the columns returned, or a projection of all table columns
FROM: Lists the tables used in the query and how they are associated, or joined
WHERE: Filters the data to return only the rows that satisfy the condition in the predicate
GROUP BY: Defines the groups over which the data is aggregated
HAVING: Filters the data after the grouping with conditions that refer to aggregations
ORDER BY: Sorts the rows returned to the client application
Let's start with the simplest concept of SQL that every Tom, Dick, and Harry is aware of! The simplest query to retrieve the data you can write includes the
SELECT and the
FROM clauses. In the select clause, you can use the star character, literally
SELECT *, to denote that you need all columns from a table in the result set. The following code switches to the
AdventureWorksDW2017 database context and selects all data from the
USE AdventureWorksDW2017; GO SELECT * FROM dbo.DimEmployee;
This query returns 296 rows, all employees with all columns.
SELECT * is not recommended in production. Queries withÂ
SELECT * can return an unexpected result when the table structure changes and are also not suitable for good optimization.
Better than using
SELECT * is to explicitly list only the columns you need. This means you are returning only a projection on the table. The following example selects only three columns from the table:
SELECT EmployeeKey, FirstName, LastName FROM dbo.DimEmployee;
Here is the shortened result, limited to the first three rows only:
EmployeeKey FirstName LastName ----------- --------- ---------- 1 Guy Gilbert 2 Kevin Brown 3 Roberto Tamburello
Object names in SQL Server, such as table and column, can include spaces. Names that include spaces are called delimited identifiers. To make SQL Server properly understand them as column names, you must enclose delimited identifiers in square brackets. However, if you prefer to have names without spaces, or if you use computed expressions in the column list, you can add column aliases. The following code uses an expression in the
SELECT clause to create a calculated column called
[Full Name], and then uses the
INTO clause to store the data in a table.
The next query retrieves the data from the newly created and populatedÂ
SELECT EmployeeKey, FirstName + ' ' + LastName AS [Full Name] INTO dbo.EmpFUll FROM dbo.DimEmployee; GO SELECT EmployeeKey, [Full Name] FROM dbo.EmpFUll;
Here is the partial result:
EmployeeKey Full Name ----------- ------------------ 1 Guy Gilbert 2 Kevin Brown 3 Roberto Tamburello
As you have seen before, there are 296 employees. If you check the full result of the first query, you might notice that there is a column named
SalesPersonFlag in the
dbo.DimEmployee table. You might want to check which of the employees are also salespeople. You can filter the results of a query with the
WHERE clause, as the following query shows:
SELECT EmployeeKey, FirstName, LastName FROM dbo.DimEmployee WHERE SalesPersonFlag = 1;
This query returns 17 rows only.
In a relational database, you typically have data spread in multiple tables. Each table represents a set of entities of the same kind, such as employeesÂ in the examples you have seen so far. In order to make result sets meaningful for the business your database supports, most of the time you need to retrieve data from multiple tables in the same query. You need to join two or more tables based on some conditions. The most frequent kind of a join is the inner join. An inner join returns only rows for which the condition in the join predicate for the two joined tables evaluates to true. Note that in a relational database, you have three-valued logic, because there is always a possibility that a piece of data is unknown. You mark the unknown with the
NULL keyword. A predicate can thus evaluate to true, false, or NULL. For an inner join, the order of the tables involved in the join is not important.
In the following example, you can see the
dbo.DimEmployee table joined with an inner join to the
SELECT e.EmployeeKey, e.FirstName, e.LastName, fr.SalesAmount FROM dbo.DimEmployee AS e INNER JOIN dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey;
Here are the partial results:
EmployeeKey FirstName LastName SalesAmount ----------- --------- -------- ----------- 285 Tsvi Reiter 2024.994 285 Tsvi Reiter 6074.982 285 Tsvi Reiter 2024.994
In the previous query, you can see that table aliases are used. If a column's name is unique across all tables in the query, you can use it without a table name. If not, you need to use table name in front of the column, to avoid ambiguous column names, in theÂ
table.columnÂ format. In the previous query, the
EmployeeKey column appears in both tables. Therefore, you need to precede this column name with the table name of its origin to avoid ambiguity. You can shorten the two-part column names by using table aliases. You specify table aliases in the
FROM clause. Once you specify table aliases, you must always use the aliases; you can't refer to the original table names in that query anymore. Please note that a column name might be unique in the query at the moment when you write the query. However, later somebody could add a column with the same name in another table involved in the query. If the column name is not preceded by an alias or by the table name, you would get an error when executing the query because of the ambiguous column name. In order to make the code more stable and more readable, you should always use table aliases for each column in the query.
The previous query returned 60,855 rows. It is always recommended to know at least approximately the number of rows your query should return. This number is the first control of the correctness of the result set, or said differently, whether the query is written in a logically correct way. If every sale has an employee, as it should have, then the previous query should have returned exactly the number of rowsÂ
dbo.FactResellerSales has. You can quickly check the number of rows in the
dbo.FactResellerSales table with the help of the
COUNT(*) aggregate function, as the following query shows:
SELECT COUNT(*) AS ResellerSalesCount FROM dbo.FactResellerSales;
The result is, as you probably expected, 60,855 rows.
You can join multiple tables in a single query. The following code joins seven tables in a single query. Note that all of the joins are still inner joins. The query returns 60,855 rows again, with at least 1 column from each table involved in the query:
SELECT e.EmployeeKey, e.FirstName, e.LastName, r.ResellerKey, r.ResellerName, d.DateKey, d.CalendarYear, d.CalendarQuarter, p.ProductKey, p.EnglishProductName, ps.EnglishProductSubcategoryName, pc.EnglishProductCategoryName, fr.OrderQuantity, fr.SalesAmount FROM dbo.DimEmployee AS e INNER JOIN dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey INNER JOIN dbo.DimReseller AS r ON r.ResellerKey = fr.ResellerKey INNER JOIN dbo.DimDate AS d ON fr.OrderDateKey = d.DateKey INNER JOIN dbo.DimProduct AS p ON fr.ProductKey = p.ProductKey INNER JOIN dbo.DimProductSubcategory AS ps ON p.ProductSubcategoryKey = ps.ProductSubcategoryKey INNER JOIN dbo.DimProductCategory AS pc ON ps.ProductCategoryKey = pc.ProductCategoryKey;
dbo.Employees table, there are 17 salespeople. Do all of them have at least one sale, at least one row from the
dbo.FactResellerSales table associated with the employee key of that salesperson? You can check how many distinct employees have sales associated with them with the help of the
SELECT DISTINCT fr.EmployeeKey FROM dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr;
The query returns 17 rows. Now imagine that you would like to list all sales rows together with the employees' data, but you also need to include in the result the employees that are not salespeople, that do now have any row associated with their
EmployeeKey column in the fact table. You can use an outer join to fulfill this task.
With an outer join, you preserve the rows from one or both tables, even if they don't have a match in the other table. The result set returned includes all of the matched rows, like what you get from an inner join plus the preserved rows. Within an outer join, the order of the tables involved in the join might be important. If you use
LEFT OUTER JOIN, the rows from the left table are preserved. If you use
RIGHT OUTER JOIN, the rows from the right table are preserved. Of course, in both cases, the order of the tables involved in the join is important. With
FULL OUTER JOIN, you preserve the rows from both tables, and the order of the tables is not important. The following query uses a left outer join to preserve the rows from the
SELECT e.EmployeeKey, e.FirstName, e.LastName, fr.SalesAmount FROM dbo.DimEmployee AS e LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey;
The query returns 61,134 rows. Did we get all of the employees in the result? You can check this by checking the distinct
EmployeeKey after the outer join:
SELECT DISTINCT e.EmployeeKey FROM dbo.DimEmployee AS e LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey;
The query returns 296 rows, which is the number of employees.
Joining more than two tables is not tricky if all of the joins are inner joins. The order of joins is not important. However, you might want to execute an outer join after all of the inner joins. If you don't control the join order with the outer joins, it might happen that a subsequent inner join filters out the preserved rows ofÂ an outer join. You can control the join order with parentheses. The following query uses the right outer join to preserve all employees and makes sure that this join is executed after all inner joins:
SELECT e.EmployeeKey, e.FirstName, e.LastName, r.ResellerKey, r.ResellerName, d.DateKey, d.CalendarYear, d.CalendarQuarter, p.ProductKey, p.EnglishProductName, ps.EnglishProductSubcategoryName, pc.EnglishProductCategoryName, fr.OrderQuantity, fr.SalesAmount FROM (dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr INNER JOIN dbo.DimReseller AS r ON r.ResellerKey = fr.ResellerKey INNER JOIN dbo.DimDate AS d ON fr.OrderDateKey = d.DateKey INNER JOIN dbo.DimProduct AS p ON fr.ProductKey = p.ProductKey INNER JOIN dbo.DimProductSubcategory AS ps ON p.ProductSubcategoryKey = ps.ProductSubcategoryKey INNER JOIN dbo.DimProductCategory AS pc ON ps.ProductCategoryKey = pc.ProductCategoryKey) RIGHT OUTER JOIN dbo.DimEmployee AS e ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey;
Perform all inner joins, with an arbitrary order among them
Execute the left outer join after all of the inner joins
SELECT e.EmployeeKey, MIN(e.LastName) AS LastName, SUM(fr.OrderQuantity)AS EmpTotalQuantity, SUM(fr.SalesAmount) AS EmpTotalAmount FROM dbo.DimEmployee AS e INNER JOIN dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey GROUP BY e.EmployeeKey;
The query returns 17 aggregated rows. Here are the results, abbreviated to the first three rows only:
EmployeeKey LastName EmpTotalQuantity EmpTotalAmount ----------- ---------- ---------------- -------------- 284 Vargas 11544 3609447.2163 295 Valdez 6898 1790640.2311 281 Blythe 23058 9293903.0055
SELECT clause, you can have only the columns used for grouping, or aggregated columns. That is why the
LastName column in the
SELECT list is used in the
MIN() aggregate function. You need to get a scalar, a single aggregated value for each row for each column not included in the
GROUP BY list.
Sometimes, you need to filter aggregated data. For example, you might need to find only the employees for which the sum of the order quantity did not reach 10,000. You can filter the result set on the aggregated data by using the
SELECT e.EmployeeKey, MIN(e.LastName) AS LastName, SUM(fr.OrderQuantity)AS EmpTotalQuantity, SUM(fr.SalesAmount) AS EmpTotalAmount FROM dbo.DimEmployee AS e INNER JOIN dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey GROUP BY e.EmployeeKey HAVING SUM(fr.OrderQuantity) < 10000;
The query returns eight rows only. Note that you can't use column aliases from the
SELECT clause in any other clause introduced in the previous query. The
SELECT clause logically executes after all other clauses from the query, and the aliases are not known yet. However, the
ORDER BY clause, which sorts the result, executes after the
SELECT clause, and therefore the columns aliases are already known and you can refer to them. The following query shows the nine employees with sum of the
OrderQuantity variable greater than 10,000, sorted in descending order by this sum:
SELECT e.EmployeeKey, MIN(e.LastName) AS LastName, SUM(fr.OrderQuantity)AS EmpTotalQuantity, SUM(fr.SalesAmount) AS EmpTotalAmount FROM dbo.DimEmployee AS e INNER JOIN dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey GROUP BY e.EmployeeKey HAVING SUM(fr.OrderQuantity) > 10000 ORDER BY EmpTotalQuantity DESC;
You can see the shortened results as follows:
EmployeeKey LastName EmpTotalQuantity EmpTotalAmount ----------- ---------- ---------------- -------------- 282 Mitchell 27229 10367007.4286 283 Carson 27051 10065803.5429 291 Pak 26231 8503338.6472
Aggregating data over the complete input rowset or aggregating in groups produces aggregated rows only,Â either one row for the whole input rowset or one row per group. Sometimes, you need to return aggregates together with the detail data. One way to achieve this is by using subqueries, which are queries inside queries.
The next query shows an example of using two subqueries in a single query: in the
SELECT clause, a subquery that calculates the sum of quantity for each employee. It returns a scalar value. The subquery refers to the employee key from the outer query. The subquery can't execute without the outer query. This is a correlated subquery. There is another subquery in the
FROM clause that calculates the overall quantity for all employees. This query returns a table, although it is a table with a single row and a single column. This query is a self-contained subquery, independent of the outer query. A subquery in the
FROM clause is also called a derived table.
Another type of join is used to add the overall total to each detail row. A cross-join is a Cartesian product of two input rowsets: each row from one side is associated with every single row from the other side. No join condition is needed. A cross-join can produce an unwanted, huge result set. For example, if you cross-join just 1,000 rows from the left side of the join with 1,000 rows from the right side, you get 1,000,000 rows in the output. Therefore, typically you want to avoid a cross-join in production. However, in the example in the following query, 60,855 from the left-side rows is cross-joined to a single row from the subquery, therefore producing only 60,855. Effectively, this means that the overall total column is added to each detail row:
SELECT e.EmployeeKey, e.LastName, fr.SalesAmount, (SELECT SUM(fr1.SalesAmount) FROM dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr1 WHERE fr1.EmployeeKey = e.EmployeeKey) AS TotalPerEmployee, frt.GrandTotal FROM (dbo.DimEmployee AS e INNER JOIN dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey) CROSS JOIN (SELECT SUM(fr2.SalesAmount) AS GrandTotal FROM dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr2) AS frt ORDER BY e.EmployeeKey;
Here is the abbreviated output of the previous query:
EmployeeKey LastName SalesAmount TotelPerEmployee GrandTotal ----------- ---------- ------------ ---------------- ------------- 272 Jiang 1619.52 1092123.8562 80450596.9823 272 Jiang 1445.1898 1092123.8562 80450596.9823 272 Jiang 714.7043 1092123.8562 80450596.9823
In the previous example code, the correlated subquery in the
SELECT clause has to logically execute once per row of the outer query. The query was partially optimized by moving the self-contained subquery for the overall total in the
FROM clause, where it logically executes only once. Although SQL Server can optimize correlated subqueries and convert them to joins, there exists a much better and more efficient way to achieve the same result as the previous query returned. You can do this by using the window functions.
The following query uses theÂ
SUMÂ window aggregate function to calculate the total over each employee and the overall total. The
OVER clause defines the partitions, or the windows of the calculation. The first calculation is partitioned over each employee, meaning that the total quantity per employee is reset to zero for each new employee. The second calculation uses an
OVER clause without specifying partitions, meaning the calculation is done over all input rowsets. This query produces exactly the same result as the previous one:
SELECT e.EmployeeKey, e.LastName, fr.SalesAmount, SUM(fr.SalesAmount) OVER(PARTITION BY e.EmployeeKey) AS TotalPerEmployee, SUM(fr.SalesAmount) OVER() AS GrandTotal FROM dbo.DimEmployee AS e INNER JOIN dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey ORDER BY e.EmployeeKey;
Now assume that you need to calculate some statistics of the totals of the employees' orders. You need to calculate the running total amount for employees, and the moving average of this total over the last three employees, ordered by the employee key. This means you need to calculate the totals over employeesÂ in advance, and then use aggregate functions on these aggregates. You could do aggregations over employees in advance in a derived table. However, there is another way to achieve this. You can define the derived table in advance, in the
WITH clause of the
SELECT statement. This subquery is called a common table expression, orÂ CTE.
CTEs are more readable than derived tables and might be also more efficient. You could use the result of the same
CTE multiple times in the outer query. If you use derived tables, you need to define them multiple times if you want to use them multiple times in the outer query. The following query shows the usage ofÂ
CTE to calculate the total amount for all employees and then just shows the results in the outer query:
WITH EmpTotalCTE AS ( SELECT e.EmployeeKey, MIN(e.LastName) AS LastName, SUM(fr.SalesAmount) AS TotalPerEmployee FROM dbo.DimEmployee AS e INNER JOIN dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey GROUP BY e.EmployeeKey ) SELECT EmployeeKey, LastName, TotalPerEmployee FROM EmpTotalCTE ORDER BY EmployeeKey;
The query returns 17 rows, one for each employee, with the total sales amount for this employee. Now let's add the running total and the moving average in the outer query:
WITH EmpTotalCTE AS ( SELECT e.EmployeeKey, MIN(e.LastName) AS LastName, SUM(fr.SalesAmount) AS TotalPerEmployee FROM dbo.DimEmployee AS e INNER JOIN dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey GROUP BY e.EmployeeKey ) SELECT EmployeeKey, LastName, TotalPerEmployee, SUM(TotalPerEmployee) OVER(ORDER BY EmploYeeKey ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS RunningTotal, AVG(TotalPerEmployee) OVER(ORDER BY EmploYeeKey
ROWS BETWEEN 2 PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS MovingAverage FROM EmpTotalCTE ORDER BY EmployeeKey;
Here are the partial results with the first five and last two rows:
EmployeeKey LastName TotelPerEmployee RunningTotal MovingAverage ----------- --------- ---------------- -------------- ------------- 272 Jiang 1092123.8562 1092123.8562 1092123.8562 281 Blythe 9293903.0055 10386026.8617 5193013.4308 282 Mitchell 10367007.4286 20753034.2903 6917678.0967 283 Carson 10065803.5429 30818837.8332 9908904.659 284 Vargas 3609447.2163 34428285.0495 8014086.0626 â¦ 295 Valdez 1790640.2311 79028786.0571 1425236.791 296 Tsoflias 1421810.9252 80450596.9823 1128325.2026
Note that the running total for the last employee, sorted by the employee key, is the grand total. You can also check whether the running total and moving average are calculated correctly.
In the previous query, you can see that in the
OVER() clause, I defined the frame of the calculation of the running total and the moving average for each row. For the running total, the frame is all rows from the first row in the window to the current row, and for the moving average, it is the last three rows, including the current row.
You can use many other functions for window calculations. For example, you can use the ranking functions, such asÂ
ROW_NUMBER(), to calculate some rank in the window or in the overall rowset. However, rank can be defined only over some order of the calculation. You can specify the order of the calculation in the
ORDER BY sub-clause inside the
OVER clause. Please note that this
ORDER BY clause defines only the logical order of the calculation, and not the order of the rows returned. A standalone, outer
ORDER BY at the end of the query defines the order of the result.
The following query calculates a sequential number, the row number of each row in the output, for each detail row of the input rowset. The row number is calculated once in partitions for each employee and defines the row number or the position of every single reseller for each employee, ordered by the sales amount, in descending order:
WITH EmpResTotalCTE AS ( SELECT e.EmployeeKey, r.ResellerKey, MIN(e.LastName) AS LastName, MIN(r.ResellerName) AS ResellerName, SUM(fr.SalesAmount) AS EmpResTotal FROM dbo.DimEmployee AS e INNER JOIN dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr ON e.EmployeeKey = fr.EmployeeKey INNER JOIN dbo.DimReseller AS r ON r.ResellerKey = fr.ResellerKey GROUP BY e.EmployeeKey, r.ResellerKey ) SELECT EmployeeKey, LastName, ResellerName, EmpResTotal, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY EmployeeKey ORDER BY EmpResTotal DESC) AS PositionByEmployee FROM EmpResTotalCTE ORDER BY EmployeeKey, EmpResTotal DESC;
Here are the partial results:
EmployeeKey LastName ResellerName EmpResTotal PositionByEmployee ----------- -------- -------------- ----------- ------------------ 272 Jiang Thorough Parts 198993.3507 1 272 Jiang Sheet Metal 138046.3212 2 272 Jiang Vigorous Exercise 125422.2079 3 272 Jiang Sales and Supply 79994.1743 4 â¦ 281 Blythe Totes & Baskets 463030.757 1 281 Blythe First Bike 437319.784 2 281 Blythe Modular Cycle 389208.6639 3 281 Blythe Fitness Toy Store 375100.3084 4 â¦ 296 Tsoflias Eastside Cycle 2223.7009 30 296 Tsoflias Twin Cycles 1336.23 31 296 Tsoflias Kids and Adults 753.768 32 296 Tsoflias Major Bicycle 200.052 33
In the abbreviated results shown previously, each sales amount total for each reseller and employee combination is unique. That's why all of the row numbers are in the right positionÂ âÂ
1 is before
2, which is before
3, and so on. Now imagine that the second and the third reseller (
Sheet Metal and
Vigorous Exercise) for the first employee (
Jiang) would have the same total, for example 138,046.3212. Then you could get the wrong order of row numbers in the results, as shown here:
EmployeeKey LastName ResellerName EmpResTotal PositionByEmployee ----------- -------- -------------- ----------- ------------------ 272 Jiang Thorough Parts 198993.3507 1
272 Jiang Vigorous Exercise 138046.3212 3 272 Jiang Sheet Metal 138046.3212 2 272 Jiang Sales and Supply 79994.1743 4
The order of the result is defined over the sales total, and not over the row number. You can't know in advance which row will get which row number when the order of the calculation is not defined in unique values.
SELECT SalesOrderNumber, SalesOrderLineNumber, SalesAmount FROM dbo.FactResellerSales ORDER BY SalesAmount DESC OFFSET 0 ROWS FETCH NEXT 6 ROWS ONLY;
Here are the results:
SalesOrderNumber SalesOrderLineNumber SalesAmount ----------------- -------------------- ----------- SO55282 39 27893.619 SO43884 17 27055.7604 SO51131 12 26159.2081 SO43875 12 24938.4761 SO57054 26 23667.8549 SO43875 10 23190.6518
The question that arises is whether order
SO43875, line number
10, is the only sale with the sales amount equal to
23190.6518. You could try to execute the previous query again, but with limiting the output to the first seven rows, then eight rows, and so on. SQL Server offers another possibility, the
TOP clause. You can specify
WITH TIES, meaning you can get all of the rows with ties on the last value in the output. However, this way, you don't know the number of the rows in the output in advance. The following query shows this approach:
SELECT TOP 6 WITH TIES SalesOrderNumber, SalesOrderLineNumber, SalesAmount FROM dbo.FactResellerSales ORDER BY SalesAmount DESC;
In the results of the last query, you get seven rows:
SalesOrderNumber SalesOrderLineNumber SalesAmount ----------------- -------------------- ----------- SO55282 39 27893.619 SO43884 17 27055.7604 SO51131 12 26159.2081 SO43875 12 24938.4761 SO57054 26 23667.8549 SO44795 18 23190.6518 SO43875 10 23190.6518
The next task is to get the top three resellers by amount for a specific employee. Here is the query that returns the top four resellers for the employee with the employee key equal to 272:
SELECT TOP 3 fr.EmployeeKey, fr.ResellerKey, SUM(fr.SalesAmount) AS EmpResTotal FROM dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr WHERE fr.EmployeeKey = 272 GROUP BY fr.EmployeeKey, fr.ResellerKey ORDER BY EmpResTotal DESC;
You need to perform the calculation for each employee. The
APPLY Transact-SQL operator comes in handy here. You use it in the
FROM clause. You apply, or execute, a table expression defined on the right side of the operator once for each row of the input rowset from the left side of the operator. There are two flavors of this operator. The
CROSS APPLY version filters out the rows from the left rowset if the tabular expression on the right side does not return any row. The
OUTER APPLY version preserves the row from the left side, even is the tabular expression on the right side does not return any row, similar toÂ
LEFT OUTER JOIN. Of course, columns for the preserved rows do not have known values from the right-side tabular expression. The following query uses the
CROSS APPLY operator to calculate top three resellers by amount for each employee that actually does have some sales:
SELECT e.EmployeeKey, e.LastName, fr1.ResellerKey, fr1.EmpResTotal FROM dbo.DimEmployee AS e CROSS APPLY (SELECT TOP 3 fr.EmployeeKey, fr.ResellerKey, SUM(fr.SalesAmount) AS EmpResTotal FROM dbo.FactResellerSales AS fr
WHERE fr.EmployeeKey = e.EmployeeKey GROUP BY fr.EmployeeKey, fr.ResellerKey ORDER BY EmpResTotal DESC) AS fr1 ORDER BY e.EmployeeKey, fr1.EmpResTotal DESC;
The query returns 51 rows. You can see the abbreviated results here:
EmployeeKey LastName ResellerKey EmpResTotal ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- 272 Jiang 433 198993.3507 272 Jiang 436 138046.3212 272 Jiang 678 125422.2079 281 Blythe 328 463030.757 281 Blythe 670 437319.784 281 Blythe 4 389208.6639 â¦ 296 Tsoflias 573 163398.0205 296 Tsoflias 87 148996.5063 296 Tsoflias 393 145407.7395
Since this was the last query in this chapter, you can clean up your demo database with the following code:
DROP TABLE dbo.EmpFUll; GO
That's it for T-SQL for now. You will use this knowledge a lot in the forthcoming chapters for concrete data science tasks.
In this chapter, you were given a quick introduction to the mighty T-SQL
SELECT statement. You are ready to query the data you have stored in a SQL Server database. However, T-SQL is a language that is specialized to work with data, to query and modify it. It logically operates on a whole dataset at once. When operating on a whole set of data, T-SQL is extremely efficient. However, it is not very efficient for advanced mathematical operations inside a single row and between rows in a row-by-row manner. This is not very appropriate for the data science tasks, where Â you often need to perform such advanced mathematical analyses. Therefore, we need another language. In the next chapter, you will learn about the first option, the R language.