In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, it is vital to stay ahead by understanding and adopting key technologies that are driving innovation and reshaping industries. This chapter will provide you with foundational knowledge of cloud-native and blockchain technologies, their benefits, and how they can be effectively combined to deliver solutions across multiple industries. As you progress through this chapter, you will be exposed to blockchain services in the major cloud service providers—AWS, Azure, and GCP—and make informed decisions about implementing cloud-native blockchain solutions. We will explore each technology in-depth, and provide real-world examples to demonstrate their applications and potential impact.
We will cover the following main topics in this chapter:
Blockchain is a decentralized, distributed ledger technology that enables the secure recording, storage, and verification of transactions across a network of computers. It consists of a chain of blocks, where each block contains a list of transactions. These blocks are linked together using cryptographic techniques, forming a chronological chain.
One of the key problems that blockchain addresses is the issue of trust in traditional centralized systems. In traditional systems, such as banking or centralized databases, there is a reliance on intermediaries, such as banks or clearinghouses, to facilitate and validate transactions. This reliance can lead to issues such as fraud, data manipulation, censorship, and single points of failure.
Blockchain technology mitigates these issues by decentralizing the control and storage of data. Transactions on a blockchain are verified and recorded by a network of nodes, and once added to the blockchain, they are immutable and tamper-resistant. This decentralized and transparent nature of blockchain technology removes the need for intermediaries and creates a more trustless environment for transactions to occur.
Blockchain also addresses the problem of data integrity and security. The cryptographic techniques that are used in blockchain ensure that data stored on the ledger cannot be altered or tampered with without consensus from the network participants. This makes blockchain particularly suitable for applications where data integrity and security are paramount, such as financial transactions, supply chain management, voting systems, and identity management.
Myriads of books and online resources have already been written on introducing blockchain and the relevant technologies and frameworks that run along a blockchain network. Before progressing with this book, we recommend the following resources for deepening your understanding of cryptocurrency and tokens, the type and use of wallets, addresses, and cryptographic concepts, such as private and public keys, and hash values:
Blockchain operates as a form of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) that enables various stakeholders to safely collaborate and oversee an ever-expanding series of data entries, termed blocks. Every block encapsulates a group of activities, a time marker, and a nod to the preceding block. Together, these blocks create a resilient archive of all engagements undertaken on the platform.
One of the standout attributes of blockchain is its non-centralized design. This entails that the data isn’t dominated by a singular authority; instead, every member on the platform possesses a duplicate of the full ledger. Such a distributed model negates the dependency on centralized regulators or middlemen, curtailing possibilities of manipulation, deceit, and singular breakdowns.
Encryption is pivotal in preserving the trustworthiness of the blockchain. Each block carries a distinct cryptographic signature, conceived from the block’s details and the signature of its predecessor. This setup renders it exceedingly challenging to modify a block’s data without influencing the blocks that follow, guaranteeing the permanence of the blockchain.
Blockchains can be classified into three primary categories: public, private, and consortium. Each serves its purpose with distinct features and preferred applications.
Public blockchains operate as open platforms accessible to any individual willing to join. Bitcoin and Ethereum are classic representations of this type. These blockchains pride themselves on deep-rooted decentralization and formidable security measures. However, their intricate validation procedures, such as Proof of Work (PoW), can sometimes restrict their speed and scalability. Public blockchains excel in environments that demand trust, openness, and resistance to external controls, such as with decentralized apps (dapps) and virtual currencies.
Private blockchains, also known as permissioned blockchains, in contrast, are limited-access platforms that are often confined to specific entities or organizations. They are tailored for rapid transactions and superior scalability, presenting an edge over public blockchains in these aspects. However, this comes at the cost of shedding some of the complete decentralization inherent in public counterparts. For tasks prioritizing confidentiality, oversight, and swift operations, such as within organizational collaborations, supply chain tracking, or internal documentation, private blockchains emerge as the go-to choice.
Here are some examples of private blockchain platforms:
Consortium blockchains, often referred to as federated blockchains, interweave elements from both public and private types. They function under the stewardship of a group of trusted entities, rather than a single overarching body. Striking a balance, consortium blockchains marry the transparency of public chains with the control advantages of private ones. They are especially apt for situations that entail collaboration across different organizations but also necessitate a degree of privacy and control, such as in cross-border banking transactions or shared healthcare record systems.
Here are some examples of consortium blockchain platforms and their applications:
These few examples illustrate how consortium blockchains are being used across various industries to improve processes, enhance security, and facilitate collaboration between different organizations.
A core attribute of blockchain technology is its proficiency in ensuring agreement amid a distributed set of nodes. These consensus models are computational strategies that validate uniform agreement among network nodes regarding the blockchain’s status and the legitimacy of upcoming transactions. Various consensus strategies exist, each tailored with its unique benefits and limitations. Notable consensus models encompass the following:
Figure 1.1 – PoW in Bitcoin
The preceding AI-generated image visually explains the PoW consensus mechanism in Bitcoin. It depicts how miners use high-powered computers to compete in solving complex mathematical puzzles, with the successful miner unlocking a new block through the discovery of the correct hash. This process is symbolized by a golden key unlocking a block. The preceding figure also shows a network of nodes connected by digital links, highlighting the decentralized validation and addition of the newly mined block to the blockchain. The energy consumption involved in mining is represented by electricity symbols around the miners’ computers, providing a comprehensive overview of Bitcoin mining and the PoW system.
Figure 1.2 – PoS in Ethereum
The preceding AI-generated image has been created to visually explain the PoS consensus mechanism in Ethereum. It illustrates validators staking Ethereum tokens, the selection process symbolized by a digital scale, and the decentralized network of nodes. The energy efficiency of PoS is also conveyed through green energy symbols, providing a clear, engaging, and informative view of Ethereum’s PoS system.
Smart contracts represent digital contracts where the conditions of an agreement are embedded directly into the programming. Operating on blockchain platforms, they facilitate automatic and trust-free completion of deals between entities, eliminating the reliance on middlemen. These contracts can be tailored to execute a range of functions, such as handling digital asset transfers, streamlining business operations, or activating contract stipulations upon meeting certain criteria.
Ethereum pioneered the integration of smart contracts into blockchain technology, though now, multiple other blockchain systems, such as Cardano, Polkadot, and Tezos, also incorporate smart contract capabilities.
The adaptability of smart contracts opens avenues for their usage in diverse sectors, encompassing finance, logistics, insurance, property dealings, and dapps.
From a programming perspective, it’s important to emphasize that conventional programming and smart contract development are two distinct paradigms within the software development landscape, each with its unique characteristics, use cases, and challenges. Let’s have a look at some key differences between conventional programming and smart contract development:
Table 1.1 – Comparison between conventional and contract-oriented development
In summary, while both conventional programming and smart contract development share the fundamental principles of software development, they diverge significantly in their execution environments, security considerations, update mechanisms, and the ways they handle transactions and state management. These differences necessitate distinct approaches to development, testing, and deployment in each domain.
dapps are applications that are built on top of blockchain platforms, utilizing smart contracts and decentralized storage to create trustless, transparent, and censorship-resistant services. dapps leverage the unique features of blockchain technology, such as immutability, decentralization, and tokenization, to deliver innovative solutions and disrupt traditional industries.
Examples of dapps include Decentralized Finance (DeFi) platforms, decentralized marketplaces, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), and Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs).
Tokenization is the process of representing real-world assets or rights on the blockchain in the form of digital tokens. These tokens can represent anything from digital currencies and financial instruments to physical assets, such as real estate, art, or commodities.
There are two main types of tokens in the blockchain ecosystem:
Cryptocurrencies and tokens
Cryptocurrencies and tokens, such as NFTs, are both digital assets, but they serve different purposes and operate on different principles. For a start, cryptocurrency works at the network level, while tokens are governed by smart contracts. Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or Ether are fungible, meaning that each unit is interchangeable with another unit of the same value. For example, one Bitcoin is equal in value to any other Bitcoin. NFTs, on the converse, are non-fungible, meaning that each token is unique and cannot be replaced with another token of the same value. In general, while both cryptocurrencies and tokens are digital assets, they serve different purposes, have different properties, and operate on different blockchain standards. Cryptocurrencies are primarily used for financial transactions, while tokens represent ownership or authenticity of digital or physical items.
Tokenization has the potential to revolutionize various industries by enabling the creation, trading, and management of digital assets in a secure, transparent, and decentralized manner.
As blockchain technology continues to evolve, several key challenges must be addressed to unlock its full potential. These challenges include scalability, interoperability, and privacy.
Scalability is the ability of a blockchain network to handle an increasing number of transactions without compromising performance. Many public blockchains, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, face scalability issues due to their resource-intensive consensus mechanisms and limited transaction throughput.
Various solutions are being developed to improve the scalability of blockchain networks, including the following:
Interoperability refers to different blockchain platforms’ capability to engage and establish communication with each other. At present, the majority of blockchains function independently, constraining opportunities for collaboration and information sharing across chains.
Multiple initiatives focus on bolstering the mutual communication among blockchain platforms. Here are some examples:
Preserving confidentiality remains pivotal for numerous blockchain applications since actions on open blockchains can often be viewed and traced. This transparency becomes problematic for scenarios necessitating discreet information storage and operations on the blockchain.
Several innovations aimed at bolstering privacy are in development:
By understanding these core concepts, we now have a solid foundation in blockchain technology and its potential to revolutionize various industries. Now, we can delve deeper into the benefits and limitations of building cloud-native decentralized applications that leverage blockchain technology.
In this section, we will explore the concept of cloud-native technology, its underlying principles, and the benefits it brings to the modern software development landscape. We will discuss key cloud-native concepts, such as containerization, orchestration, and microservices, and provide examples of how these technologies enable the development of flexible, scalable, and resilient applications.
Cloud-native technology refers to a software development approach that leverages the advantages of cloud computing to build, deploy, and manage applications. This approach prioritizes flexibility, scalability, and resilience by leveraging modern technologies and techniques such as containerization, microservices, Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD), and Infrastructure as Code (IaC).
Cloud-native applications are designed to run on distributed and scalable infrastructure, allowing them to adapt to changing workloads and requirements quickly. This enables organizations to respond to market changes more rapidly, improve resource utilization, and optimize the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of their applications.
There are several key principles and technologies associated with cloud-native applications. These include containerization, orchestration, microservices, CI/CD, and IaC.
Containerization is a lightweight virtualization technology that allows applications and their dependencies to be packaged into isolated, portable containers. Containers can run on any platform that supports the container runtime, providing a consistent environment for development, testing, and production.
Containers provide several advantages over traditional virtualization techniques, such as reduced overhead, faster startup times, and improved resource utilization. Examples of popular containerization technologies include Docker and containerd.
Orchestration is the process of managing and automating the deployment, scaling, and operation of containerized applications. Container orchestration platforms, such as Kubernetes, Apache Mesos, and Docker Swarm, provide a framework for defining, deploying, and managing containerized applications at scale.
Orchestration platforms offer various features to support cloud-native applications, including service discovery, load balancing, rolling updates, auto-scaling, and self-healing. These features enable organizations to build and maintain applications that are highly available, scalable, and resilient.
Microservices is a software architecture pattern that involves breaking down an application into small, loosely coupled components or services. Each service is responsible for a specific piece of functionality and can be independently developed, deployed, and scaled. This approach improves the modularity, maintainability, and scalability of applications, as each service can be updated or replaced without impacting the entire system.
Microservices can be implemented using a variety of languages, frameworks, and platforms, allowing organizations to choose the best tools for their specific needs. This flexibility also enables teams to adopt new technologies and methodologies more easily as each service can evolve independently of the others.
CI/CD is a set of practices that involve the automatic building, testing, and deployment of application code changes. This approach ensures that new features, bug fixes, and other changes are integrated and delivered to users quickly and reliably.
Continuous integration involves the automatic compilation and testing of code changes, ensuring that the application remains in a releasable state at all times. Continuous delivery extends this process to include the automatic deployment of changes to production, minimizing the risk of human error and ensuring a consistent, repeatable deployment process.
CI/CD practices are a core component of cloud-native development as they enable organizations to respond to market changes more rapidly and maintain high-quality applications.
IaC is a practice that involves managing and provisioning infrastructure components, such as networks, storage, and compute resources, using code and automation. IaC allows organizations to define their infrastructure requirements using code templates, which can then be automatically deployed and managed using tools such as Terraform, Azure Resource Manager, AWS CloudFormation, and Google Cloud Deployment Manager.
By treating IaC, organizations can improve the repeatability, reliability, and consistency of their infrastructure deployments. Additionally, IaC enables organizations to adopt version control and collaborative development practices for their infrastructure, ensuring that changes are tracked and reviewed before being applied.
To better understand the advantages of cloud-native technology, it’s helpful to compare it with traditional cloud computing approaches. While both methods involve hosting applications and infrastructure on remote servers, they differ significantly in terms of architecture, development practices, and overall philosophy.
Traditional cloud computing often involves monolithic applications running on Virtual Machines (VMs) or physical servers. In this model, applications are typically built as a single, large unit that contains all the required functionality. This can make the application difficult to maintain and scale as changes to one part of the system can impact the entire application.
In contrast, cloud-native applications are built using a microservices architecture, where the application is broken down into small, loosely coupled components. This approach allows individual components to be developed, deployed, and scaled independently, making the overall system more modular and easier to manage.
Traditional cloud computing often relies on manual processes and ad hoc scripting for deploying and managing applications. This can lead to inconsistencies and errors, as well as slow release cycles and increased risk of downtime.
Cloud-native technology emphasizes automation and the use of modern development practices such as CI/CD, IaC, and containerization. These practices enable rapid, reliable, and repeatable deployments, as well as improved collaboration and visibility across development teams.
In traditional cloud computing, infrastructure management is often treated as a separate concern from application development. This can result in siloed teams and processes, as well as increased complexity and risk.
With cloud-native technology, infrastructure is treated as an integral part of the application life cycle. Using IaC and orchestration tools, developers can define, deploy, and manage infrastructure components alongside application code, ensuring a consistent and repeatable process.
In the next section, we will discuss the fundamentals of blockchain and related technologies.
In this section, we’ll examine the advantages and drawbacks of adopting cloud-native blockchain solutions. We will discuss how cloud-native technologies can enhance the performance, security, and cost-efficiency of blockchain implementations and explore the potential trade-offs and limitations.
One of the key benefits of cloud-native blockchain solutions is their ability to scale in response to changing workloads. Scalability is essential for blockchain applications that need to handle a growing number of transactions or users. By leveraging cloud-native technologies such as containerization, microservices, and auto-scaling, blockchain implementations can dynamically adapt to meet increasing demands. Consider, though, that cloud technologies are designed for elasticity and scalability, whereas blockchain networks don’t necessarily address this technical requirement. As we will see later in this chapter, scalability and performance for blockchain networks can be met with different strategies at the protocol level, including transaction rollups, state channels, and off-chain storage.
Auto-scaling is a feature provided by many cloud providers, such as AWS, Azure, and GCP, that automatically adjusts the number of resources allocated to an application based on its current workload. This capability enables cloud-native blockchain implementations to dynamically scale up or down to meet fluctuating demands, ensuring optimal performance and resource utilization.
Security is a critical concern for blockchain applications as they often involve sensitive data and transactions. Cloud-native technologies offer various security features that can enhance the security posture of a blockchain implementation.
Containerization provides a natural layer of isolation between applications and the underlying infrastructure. By running each application component in a separate container, the potential impact of a security breach is limited to the compromised container, reducing the risk of lateral movement within the system.
Sandboxing is a technique that restricts the access and permissions of an application component, limiting its potential to cause harm. Cloud-native blockchain solutions can leverage sandboxing to confine smart contracts and other components, reducing the risk of vulnerabilities or malicious code compromising the entire system.
Cloud providers offer a wide range of built-in security features that can be leveraged by cloud-native blockchain implementations. These features include data encryption, identity and access management, network security, and security monitoring and logging.
Additionally, many cloud providers are compliant with various industry standards and regulations, such as GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS. By utilizing cloud-native blockchain solutions, organizations can benefit from these compliance measures without having to implement them independently.
Cloud-native blockchain solutions can provide significant cost savings compared to traditional, on-premises implementations. By leveraging the pay-as-you-go pricing models offered by cloud providers, organizations can optimize resource utilization and reduce costs associated with hardware, maintenance, and energy consumption:
While cloud-native blockchain solutions offer numerous benefits, there are also potential trade-offs and limitations to consider. Some of these challenges include data sovereignty, vendor lock-in, and network latency.
The idea behind data governance is that data must adhere to the legal frameworks of the nation where it’s housed. When companies integrate blockchain systems into a public cloud setting, they might encounter the challenge of meeting data governance standards. These standards can be intricate, with nuances from one region to the next.
In response to these challenges, companies can opt to launch their blockchain infrastructures on cloud platforms that operate data centers in the preferred legal territories. Additionally, they might leverage mixed or diversified cloud models, ensuring data dispersion across various geographical zones.
Vendor lock-in is a potential concern when adopting cloud-native technologies as organizations may become reliant on a specific cloud provider’s infrastructure, services, and tools. This dependency can make it challenging to switch providers or migrate back to on-premises solutions.
To mitigate vendor lock-in risks, organizations can adopt multi-cloud strategies, utilize open source technologies, and implement standardized APIs and data formats that facilitate interoperability between different platforms.
Network latency can be a concern for some blockchain applications, especially those that require real-time processing or low-latency interactions. While cloud providers offer various techniques and services to optimize network performance, such as Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) and dedicated network connections, latency may still be higher compared to on-premises implementations.
Organizations should carefully assess their specific latency requirements and choose the appropriate cloud-native architecture and services to meet their needs.
In this section, we will explore the key considerations and best practices for implementing cloud-native blockchain solutions on AWS, Azure, and GCP. By understanding these factors, organizations can make informed decisions and ensure the successful deployment and management of their blockchain applications in a cloud-native environment.
Determining the right blockchain platform is paramount for executing a cloud-native blockchain initiative. Given that each platform possesses its distinct attributes, strengths, and challenges, it’s crucial to pinpoint the one that resonates most with an organization’s distinct needs. There are many blockchain networks in the market, and it would be impossible to cover all of them in depth. In the next few sections, we’ll look at the three platforms that better represent a broad utilization of permissionless and permissioned blockchain technologies for building decentralized apps: Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric, and Corda.
Ethereum presents itself as a decentralized, open source platform endorsing smart contracts and facilitating the birth of dapps. Let’s look at some of its standout features:
For organizations eyeing the development of public dapps or delving into DeFi arenas, Ethereum emerges as a favored choice.
Initiated by the Linux Foundation, Hyperledger Fabric stands out as an open source, permissioned blockchain platform tailored for enterprise scenarios. Some of its notable attributes are as follows:
Given its features, Hyperledger Fabric frequently becomes the go-to for businesses keen on integrating blockchain in sectors with regulatory measures, such as banking, healthcare, and logistics.
Tailored mainly for the world of financial services, Corda is an open source, permissioned blockchain platform. It comes equipped with features such as the following:
Corda, with its specialized attributes, is particularly fitting for financial entities keen on leveraging blockchain for facets such as asset oversight, transaction processing, and other fiscal operations.
Scalability and performance are critical considerations when implementing cloud-native blockchain solutions. Organizations must ensure that their chosen platform can handle the anticipated transaction volume and accommodate future growth. Most blockchain networks struggle on both sides in terms of scaling and performing well when the number of transactions grows. Let’s examine a couple of strategies that are commonly used in blockchain platforms to achieve better scalability and performance, namely storing data off-chain (that is, not on the blockchain digital ledger), and rolling up multiple blocks and committing them at once. This latter approach is typical in so-called Layer 2 blockchain networks.
Off-chain storage can help improve the scalability and performance of blockchain applications by moving non-essential data and processing off the blockchain. This can help reduce network congestion and transaction fees, while also improving the overall user experience.
Off-chain storage solutions can include the following:
Layer 2 solutions are built on top of existing blockchain networks and aim to improve scalability and performance by handling transactions and smart contract execution off-chain. Here are some popular Layer 2 solutions:
To make this clearer, let’s look at examples of each solution. State channels are a Layer 2 scaling solution that allows for off-chain transactions between participants, thereby reducing the load on the main blockchain and increasing transaction throughput. Let’s say we have Alice and Bob, who want to engage in multiple transactions with each other without relying on the main blockchain for every transaction. They decide to set up a state channel between themselves to facilitate these transactions. The following figure describes what happens next on a state channel:
Figure 1.3 – State channel transaction
This is what happens:
By using state channels, Alice and Bob were able to conduct multiple transactions off-chain, reducing congestion on the main blockchain and enjoying fast and low-cost transactions. State channels are particularly useful for scenarios where frequent interactions between parties are needed, such as gaming, microtransactions, or payment channels.
Moving on to an example of a plasma chain, this approach is used by Layer 2 platforms for creating scalable, hierarchical blockchain networks that can process a high volume of transactions off-chain while maintaining security through periodic on-chain settlement. Let’s consider a simple implementation of plasma called Plasma Cash, which focuses on token transfers and is often used for NFTs or unique assets. The following figure depicts the flow of transactions between Alice and Bob:
Figure 1.4 – Plasma chain for Layer 2 networks
This is what happens in a plasma chain:
In summary, plasma allows for the creation of scalable blockchain networks by conducting most transactions off-chain, with periodic settlement and on-chain verification to maintain security and trust. This framework enables applications such as decentralized exchanges, gaming platforms, and asset tokenization to achieve high throughput and low latency while leveraging the security of the Ethereum mainnet.
Rollups are a common Layer 2 scaling solution that aggregates and submits multiple transactions off-chain to the main blockchain, reducing congestion and increasing throughput. There are two main types of rollups: optimistic rollups and Zero Knowledge (ZK) rollups. Let’s look at an example of how each type works.
Alice wants to participate in a DEX on Ethereum, which is prone to high gas fees and network congestion during peak times. The DEX pictured in the following figure implements an optimistic rollup solution to improve scalability and reduce transaction costs:
Figure 1.5 – Optimistic rollup transaction process
The transaction process consists of the following steps:
Optimistic rollups enable high throughput and low-cost transactions by batching multiple transactions off-chain and submitting them to the Ethereum mainnet periodically. Users can enjoy the scalability benefits of Layer 2 solutions while still benefiting from the security and decentralization of the Ethereum mainnet.
Bob wants to participate in a DeFi protocol on Ethereum, which requires frequent interactions with smart contracts and is affected by high gas fees. The DeFi protocol depicted in the following figure implements a ZK rollup solution to achieve scalability and reduce transaction costs:
Figure 1.6 – ZK rollup transaction process
This is how the transaction process goes:
ZK rollups provide high scalability and privacy for blockchain transactions by aggregating off-chain transactions into succinct proofs (zk-SNARKs) that are verified on-chain. Users can enjoy the benefits of efficient and cost-effective transactions while preserving privacy and security.
In summary, both optimistic rollups and ZK rollups are powerful Layer 2 scaling solutions that enable high throughput and low-cost transactions on blockchain networks like Ethereum. They achieve scalability by aggregating and batching transactions off-chain before submitting them to the mainnet, thereby reducing congestion and increasing efficiency.
Security and privacy are essential aspects of any blockchain implementation. Organizations must ensure that their chosen platform provides the necessary features and controls to protect sensitive data and maintain compliance with relevant regulations.
Data encryption is a crucial aspect of securing sensitive data within a cloud-native blockchain environment. Organizations should ensure that their chosen platform supports the necessary encryption standards and protocols to protect data both at rest and in transit.
Here are some encryption techniques to consider:
Access control and identity management are critical for ensuring that only authorized users can access and interact with the blockchain network and its associated resources. Organizations should implement robust access control policies and leverage the identity management features provided by their chosen cloud provider.
Some access control and identity management considerations are as follows:
It’s important to note that access control and identity management are peculiar to permissioned blockchains, where anonymous access is not authorized. Sovrin (https://sovrin.org/) is a decentralized identity platform that provides tools and protocols for creating and managing self-sovereign identities, where individuals have control over their identity information. Sovrin allows organizations to issue verifiable credentials, such as government-issued IDs or academic certificates, which can be stored and managed by individuals using their Sovrin identities.
Another example is uPort (https://www.uport.me/), a decentralized identity platform built on Ethereum. It provides tools and libraries for developers to integrate decentralized identity into their applications, allowing users to control their identity information. Also, uPort supports the creation of self-sovereign identities, enabling users to manage their identity credentials and interact with decentralized applications in a secure and privacy-preserving manner.
Smart contracts play a crucial role in blockchain applications, and their security is of paramount importance. Organizations should ensure that their smart contracts are thoroughly audited, tested, and secured to prevent vulnerabilities and potential attacks.
Here are some smart contract security best practices:
Interoperability and integration are essential considerations for organizations looking to leverage existing systems and infrastructure within their cloud-native blockchain solutions. The chosen platform should support seamless integration with other services and provide the necessary tools and APIs for bridging blockchain networks with traditional systems.
APIs and SDKs play a crucial role in enabling seamless integration between blockchain networks and existing systems. Organizations should ensure that their chosen platform provides comprehensive API and SDK support for various programming languages and platforms.
The following are some key API and SDK features to consider:
With the expansion and progression of the blockchain universe, the emphasis on ensuring compatibility among diverse blockchain systems has amplified. Organizations need to align with platforms that facilitate communication and interaction across chains, augmenting the effectiveness of their blockchain integrations.
A few notable solutions promoting such inter-chain compatibility are as follows:
Implementing a cloud-native blockchain solution can be expensive, particularly when considering the costs associated with infrastructure, development, and ongoing maintenance. Organizations should carefully consider the costs involved and optimize their implementations to minimize expenses while maximizing the benefits.
The following are some cost optimization strategies:
In this section, we covered the key considerations and best practices for implementing cloud-native blockchain solutions on AWS, Azure, and GCP. By understanding these factors, organizations can make informed decisions and ensure the successful deployment and management of their blockchain applications in a cloud-native environment.
With that, we’ve discussed the importance of choosing the right blockchain framework, ensuring scalability and performance, securing sensitive data and transactions, enabling seamless interoperability and integration, and optimizing costs. By following these best practices, organizations can successfully implement cloud-native blockchain solutions that meet their specific requirements and deliver the desired benefits.
In this first chapter, we looked at blockchain and cloud-native technologies, exploring their core characteristics and potential synergies. We touched on the essential features of cloud-native technology, such as containerization and CI/CD pipelines, and the transformative attributes of blockchain, including distributed ledgers and consensus algorithms. We then discussed the merits and trade-offs of melding these technologies for robust, decentralized applications.
Next, we’ll start our journey together and delve into practical implementations of cloud-native Web3 applications on platforms such as AWS, Azure, and GCP to create the foundation for crafting innovative and distributed applications.
Where there is an eBook version of a title available, you can buy it from the book details for that title. Add either the standalone eBook or the eBook and print book bundle to your shopping cart. Your eBook will show in your cart as a product on its own. After completing checkout and payment in the normal way, you will receive your receipt on the screen containing a link to a personalised PDF download file. This link will remain active for 30 days. You can download backup copies of the file by logging in to your account at any time.
If you already have Adobe reader installed, then clicking on the link will download and open the PDF file directly. If you don't, then save the PDF file on your machine and download the Reader to view it.
Please Note: Packt eBooks are non-returnable and non-refundable.
Packt eBook and Licensing When you buy an eBook from Packt Publishing, completing your purchase means you accept the terms of our licence agreement. Please read the full text of the agreement. In it we have tried to balance the need for the ebook to be usable for you the reader with our needs to protect the rights of us as Publishers and of our authors. In summary, the agreement says:
If you want to purchase a video course, eBook or Bundle (Print+eBook) please follow below steps:
Our eBooks are currently available in a variety of formats such as PDF and ePubs. In the future, this may well change with trends and development in technology, but please note that our PDFs are not Adobe eBook Reader format, which has greater restrictions on security.
You will need to use Adobe Reader v9 or later in order to read Packt's PDF eBooks.
Packt eBooks are a complete electronic version of the print edition, available in PDF and ePub formats. Every piece of content down to the page numbering is the same. Because we save the costs of printing and shipping the book to you, we are able to offer eBooks at a lower cost than print editions.
When you have purchased an eBook, simply login to your account and click on the link in Your Download Area. We recommend you saving the file to your hard drive before opening it.
For optimal viewing of our eBooks, we recommend you download and install the free Adobe Reader version 9.