Featured Issues

A simple framework for making the right call under pressureSysAdminPro #68Your team has AWS, Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana, a Jira board with 400 open tickets, and runbooks.What you don't have is a way to ask "which services depend on this database?" and get a straight answer.You could check Terraform, but it may have been refactored twice already, Jira, where half the tickets reference renamed services or Slack but the thread that explains it is from a guy who left in September.Anyshift builds a live graph of your entire stack : cloud, Kubernetes, code, monitoring, and continuously maps every dependency, relationship, and version.A Perplexity for your production environment. Ask a question, get an answer grounded in what's deployed, not what's documented.New engineer onboards? She queries the graph instead of pinging Slack for two weeks.3am incident? Your on-call gets the full dependency chain and recent changes without a twenty-minute archaeology session.Reliability review? You pull the actual topology, not a whiteboard photo from last quarter.Try AnyshiftMost engineers have a default when a container breaks in production. They either restart it every time or rebuild every time. Both work often enough that you never question the habit.Until it doesn't work and you've wasted an hour at 2am doing the wrong thing.This week's article is adapted from Michael D. Smith's Mastering Docker on Windows. It's a simple restart-vs-rebuild decision framework that sounds obvious once you see it, but most teams never actually write down.Cheers,Shreyans SinghEditor-in-ChiefRead The ArticleEarly Bird Offer LIVE Now: 40% Off With Code EARLY40Book Your Seat NowOffer Ends in 72 HoursYour Container Just Broke. Here's How to Make the Right Call.A simple framework for making the right call under pressureYour container is acting up. Do you restart it or rebuild the whole image?I've seen engineers waste hours on this because they defaulted to one or the other without thinking it through. So here's how I think about it.It comes down to one question: is the problem in how the container is running, or in what was built?If it's a runtime issue: the app got stuck, a config change hasn't taken effect, something just needs a kick, restart. That's the fastest path back to normal and there's nothing wrong with it.If the image itself might be the problem, restart won't help. You'll just redeploy the same broken thing. You need to rebuild.Sounds simple, but the tricky part is knowing which situation you're in. Here's how I usually work through it.Config, env vars, or secrets changed? Restart the service. New values get picked up at runtime. No need for a new image.Base image tag or digest changed? Rebuild. Even if your code is the same, the stuff underneath it isn't. Your dependencies have moved.You built with latest or your Dockerfile pulls in dynamic dependencies? Rebuild. You don't really know what's inside that image anymore. Something upstream could have shifted without anyone noticing.Application code changed? Obviously rebuild. New code needs a new artifact.Container is misbehaving but the image checks out- tag is right, digest matches, nothing has moved upstream? Restart. The image is fine, the container just needs a fresh start.Not sure what version is even running? Don't do anything yet. Inspect first. Check your image labels, check the digest. Then decide. Guessing under pressure is how you make things worse.One small thing that helps a lot: bake a build timestamp into every image. A label, an env var, whatever. It takes seconds to add during the build and it means you can always verify what's actually running where. Saves a ton of time when you're half-awake and troubleshooting.Here's the whole thing as a quick reference:This article was adapted from Mastering Docker on Windows by Michael D. Smith. Get the BookEarly Bird Offer LIVE Now: 40% Off With Code EARLY40Book Your Seat NowOffer Ends in 72 Hours📢 If your company is interested in reaching an audience of developers and, technical professionals, and decision makers, you may want toadvertise with us.If you have any comments or feedback, just reply back to this email.Thanks for reading and have a great day! *{box-sizing:border-box}body{margin:0;padding:0}a[x-apple-data-detectors]{color:inherit!important;text-decoration:inherit!important}#MessageViewBody a{color:inherit;text-decoration:none}p{line-height:inherit}.desktop_hide,.desktop_hide table{mso-hide:all;display:none;max-height:0;overflow:hidden}.image_block img+div{display:none}sub,sup{font-size:75%;line-height:0} @media (max-width: 100%;display:block}.mobile_hide{min-height:0;max-height:0;max-width: 100%;overflow:hidden;font-size:0}.desktop_hide,.desktop_hide table{display:table!important;max-height:none!important}}

Crafting the Web: Tips, Tools, and Trends for Developers Advertise with Us|Sign Up to the Newsletter @media only screen and (max-width: 100%;} #pad-desktop {display: none !important;} } @media only screen and (max-width: 100%;} #pad-desktop {display: none !important;} } WebDevPro #127 Design Patterns as Decision Frameworks, Not Recipes Crafting the Web: Tips, Tools, and Trends for Developers Unblocked: The context layer your AI tools are missing Give your agents the understanding they need to generate reliable code, reviews, and answers. Unblocked builds context from your team’s code, PR history, conversations, documentation, planning tools, and runtime signals. It surfaces the insights that matter so AI outputs reflect how your system actually works. See how it works Welcome to this week’s issue of WebDevPro. If you’ve been building and maintaining systems for a while, you’ve probably felt the friction that doesn’t show up in code reviews. And here’s something that doesn’t get said often enough: most engineering pain isn’t caused by bad code. It’s caused by unexamined decisions. Nobody deliberately optimizes for rigidity. Nobody sets out to make performance worse or future changes harder. But when trade-offs aren’t made explicit, that’s exactly where teams end up. You notice it when: A small requirement change forces a wide refactor A performance issue appears under load and the root cause isn’t obvious “Best practice” debates stall because everyone is arguing from instinct, not intent We’re often handed rules like these: Use strict equality Avoid blocking I/O Prefer Map over Object Use Set for deduplication Be careful with parseInt These guidelines are useful, especially early on. They prevent common mistakes. But over time, following rules without understanding the trade-offs turns into habit, not judgment. This week’s issue looks at patterns differently. Not as templates to apply or badges of clean code, but as decision frameworks. By the end of this article, you’ll start seeing what a piece of code is really optimizing for, notice the hidden costs behind everyday implementation choices, think more deliberately about where change should happen, and reframe conversations from “Is this correct?” to “What are we trading off?” That shift from applying rules to making deliberate trade-offs is where engineering starts to feel intentional. And that’s what we’re unpacking today. Code Shape and the Cost of Change Most problematic code works. That’s why it survives. createUser(name, email, password, phoneNumber, role = 'guest') There’s nothing obviously wrong here. Until the domain changes. Add a required field. Deprecate one parameter. Split roles into multiple variants. Now you’re updating dozens of call sites and hoping argument order wasn’t misused somewhere. Switching to object parameters: createUser({ name, email, password, phoneNumber, role = 'guest' }) This changes what the API optimizes for. Specifically, order stops mattering, adding fields becomes safer, and call sites become self-documenting. This is design thinking at the function level. You’re choosing a shape that absorbs change instead of amplifying it. Hidden Transformations and Predictability Loose equality in JavaScript produces results that surprise people: false == 0 // true '' == false // true [] == false // true These aren’t bugs; they follow the language’s coercion rules. The issue is that the conversion happens implicitly. When a comparison behaves unexpectedly, it looks like a logic error, not a type conversion chain. Using === keeps comparisons explicit. It removes hidden work. Parsing has similar edges. parseInt(0.0000005) // 5 parseInt converts its input to a string, then parses from the start until it hits an invalid character. A number like 0.0000005 may be represented as "5e-7", so parsing stops at "e". This is documented behavior. The problem isn’t the function. It’s assuming there are no intermediate transformations. The broader lesson: implicit conversions reduce clarity. When behavior depends on hidden steps, bugs become harder to reason about. Runtime Reality: Blocking Work and Delegation Node.js executes JavaScript on a single main thread that drives the event loop. CPU-heavy synchronous code blocks that thread. While it runs, nothing else progresses. That’s why synchronous work in request handlers can reduce throughput and increase latency under load. Asynchronous APIs often help because some operations can be delegated to the system or to worker threads (for example, many crypto operations have asynchronous variants). The main thread remains free to coordinate. But async alone doesn’t solve architectural problems. Performance often improves more by reducing how often expensive work runs than by simply changing it to async. Caching, batching, and eliminating redundant computation frequently have a bigger impact than switching APIs. The real pattern isn’t “async good, sync bad.” It’s understanding where your runtime is serial and designing accordingly. Data Structures as Cost Models Choosing between Object, Map, Array, and Set is about workload and not preference. Objects fit well when: keys are known and stable you’re modeling record-like data JSON serialization matters Maps fit well when: keys are dynamic frequent insertions and deletions occur iteration order must be preserved non-string keys are required Arrays excel at ordered data and transformations. Sets excel at uniqueness and fast membership checks. No structure is universally better. Each implies a different cost model. When you align structure with usage patterns, the code becomes simpler and more predictable. Classic Patterns: Controlling Where Change Happens Design patterns get introduced as diagrams. Boxes, arrows, interfaces. In practice, nobody reaches for Strategy because they love abstractions. They reach for it because some piece of logic keeps changing and it’s starting to infect everything around it. Pricing rules change. Validation rules change. Feature flags change. If that logic is scattered across the system, every update becomes a small cleanup project. Strategy just gives that volatility a place to live. Observer shows up when components are getting too aware of each other. One module updates something and suddenly three others need to react. Hard-coded calls turn into a web of dependencies. Events or observers aren’t about elegance. They’re about reducing how much each part needs to know. Adapter is what you write when an external API doesn’t quite fit your model, and you don’t want your entire codebase shaped by someone else’s decisions. It’s a boundary. A buffer. None of these patterns are impressive on their own. What they’re really doing is controlling where change hurts. They add indirection, yes. That indirection costs something. But in return, you stop paying interest every time requirements shift. That’s the trade. Containment Over Cleverness There’s always a moment when modifying a prototype feels like a clever shortcut. You add a helper to Array.prototype so you don’t have to import a utility everywhere. You tweak Object.prototype to normalize something globally. It works. It even feels elegant. The catch is that you’ve quietly changed the rules for the entire runtime. Now every array in the system has that extra method. Every object inherits the behavior whether it asked for it or not. If something breaks, the failure won’t point back to your “nice little improvement.” It’ll surface somewhere unrelated, and debugging it will take longer than the shortcut saved. In small scripts, this might be fine. In shared codebases, libraries, or long-lived services, it’s a different story. The blast radius is bigger than it looks. Most engineers grow out of this not because someone tells them it’s wrong, but because they’ve spent a day tracing a bug back to a global modification they forgot existed. After that, containment starts to feel a lot more attractive than cleverness. Final words: Making Trade-offs Explicit The deepest anti-pattern isn’t picking the “wrong” API but rather building for neatness today in places that are guaranteed to change later. That’s why patterns matter. Not because they’re clever, but because they force the trade-offs into the open: CPU vs latency memory vs speed coupling vs flexibility simplicity now vs adaptability later Used like recipes, patterns turn rigid fast. Used like decision frameworks, they do something much more valuable: they make teams talk about consequences instead of preferences. You spend less time arguing about “best practices,” and more time agreeing on what kind of system you’re actually building. That’s the shift from following rules to developing engineering judgment. This Week in the News 🧩TypeScript 6.0 Beta Is Here and 7.0 Will Change More Than You Think: TypeScript 6.0 is now in beta and while it looks like a transitional release, it lays the groundwork for the Go-based TypeScript 7. Some changes may subtly affect existing projects, especially around deprecated behaviors and internal shifts. This is the release to test against early so you are not caught off guard when 7.0 lands with deeper architectural changes. 🌐 WebMCP and EPP Show Where Chrome Wants the Web to Go Next: With WebMCP and EPP, Chrome is exploring structured communication between web apps and external processes. This could reshape how developer tools, AI agents, and browser-based apps coordinate capabilities. If you care about automation-heavy workflows or AI-assisted development, this signals where the platform is heading. 🔗 npm Just Made Supply Chain Security Harder to Ignore: npm 11.10.0 rolls out bulk trusted publishing configuration and stronger lifecycle script protections. Teams managing multiple packages can now streamline trusted publishing, while script security improvements reduce risk from malicious or unexpected install-time behavior. Worth reading if you maintain libraries or ship production packages regularly. 🛠️ Interop 2026 Aims to Remove More Cross Browser Headaches: Interop is a yearly cross-browser effort where engine teams align on specific platform features and work together to close gaps in behavior and support. Interop 2026 is now announced, continuing the collaboration between WebKit, Chromium, and Gecko with a fresh set of focus areas. For developers, it is one of the most reliable signals of which web platform fixes are actually likely to land across all major browsers. Beyond the Headlines ⚡Node vs Deno vs Bun Benchmarks Show Where the Real Gaps Are: Fresh performance benchmarks compare Node.js, Deno, and Bun across real-world scenarios rather than synthetic micro tests. The results challenge a few common assumptions about which runtime is “fastest” and where that speed actually matters. Worth reading before you make runtime decisions based purely on hype or benchmark screenshots. 🧠 Performance Is Not a Technical Problem: This essay argues that most performance issues stem from priorities, incentives, and product decisions rather than raw engineering limits. It reframes optimization as a cultural and organizational question, not just a profiling exercise. A sharp perspective shift for anyone working on growing codebases where “we’ll fix it later” keeps winning. ♟️What Deep Blue Still Teaches Us About AI Hype: Simon Willison revisits IBM’s Deep Blue moment and connects it to today’s AI narratives. The piece explores how milestone victories shape public perception, funding, and expectations long after the headlines fade. A thoughtful read for developers navigating the current AI wave and trying to separate signal from spectacle. 🧵 HTTP in Node.js Gets Tricky Fast and This Guide Explains Why: Making an HTTP request in Node.js looks simple until you hit retries, timeouts, streaming, backpressure, and error handling in real production code. This deep dive breaks down the patterns that help you move beyond quick fixes and build request logic that stays reliable under load. It’s also a great preview of the thinking behind Node.js Design Patterns, one of the most practical books for developers building serious Node.js systems. Tool of the Week 🧮 Excelize Makes Spreadsheet Automation in Go Feel Like a Superpower If you’ve ever had to generate Excel reports, clean up spreadsheets, or build export pipelines, you already know the pain: most tooling is either fragile or wildly overcomplicated. Excelize, built by Ri Xuis an open-source Go library that makes working with real .xlsx files feel straightforward, from formatting and formulas to charts and large-file handling. The most interesting part is the story behind it. The write-up on how Excelize was builtshows what it takes to make “boring” infrastructure reliable: handling OpenXML edge cases, keeping the API Go-friendly, and evolving features without breaking existing users. It’s a strong example of how long-term OSS gets built, one painful spreadsheet at a time. Good developer tooling rarely starts as “let’s build a library.” It starts as “this keeps hurting, let’s fix it properly.” Excelize is the result of sticking with that fix long enough to turn it into real infrastructure. That’s all for this week. Have any ideas you want to see in the next article? Hit Reply! Cheers! Editor-in-chief, Kinnari Chohan Brought to you in cooperation with Unblocked: SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE AND SHARE IT WITH A FRIEND! *{box-sizing:border-box}body{margin:0;padding:0}a[x-apple-data-detectors]{color:inherit!important;text-decoration:inherit!important}#MessageViewBody a{color:inherit;text-decoration:none}p{line-height:inherit}.desktop_hide,.desktop_hide table{mso-hide:all;display:none;max-height:0;overflow:hidden}.image_block img+div{display:none}sub,sup{font-size:75%;line-height:0}#converted-body .list_block ol,#converted-body .list_block ul,.body [class~=x_list_block] ol,.body [class~=x_list_block] ul,u+.body .list_block ol,u+.body .list_block ul{padding-left:20px} @media (max-width: 100%;display:block}.mobile_hide{min-height:0;max-height:0;max-width: 100%;overflow:hidden;font-size:0}.desktop_hide,.desktop_hide table{display:table!important;max-height:none!important}} @media only screen and (max-width: 100%;} #pad-desktop {display: none !important;} } @media only screen and (max-width: 100%;} #pad-desktop {display: none !important;} }